Cerebral blood flow pattern in patients with carotid artery stenosis with low trans-stenotic blood flow
Zarrinkoob, L.; Myrnäs, S.; Wahlin, A.; Eklund, A.; Malm, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCompromised cerebral blood flow has been identified as a contributing risk factor for future ischemic events in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. Nevertheless, the hemodynamic impact of carotid stenosis is rarely evaluated. The aim of this observational cross-section study was to investigate how a reduced internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow rate (BFR), rather than stenosis degree, relates to BFR in the cerebral arteries. MethodsFour-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D-PCMRI) was used to measure cerebral blood flow in 38 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis ([≥]50%), being considered for carotid endarterectomy. The BFR in the cerebral arteries was compared between two subgroups that were based on the BFR in the symptomatic (ipsilateral) ICA: I. reduced ICA flow (<160 mL/min) i.e., 2 SD <normal ICA BFR; II. preserved ICA flow ([≥]160 mL/min). Furthermore, BFR laterality was defined as a difference in the paired ipsilateral-contralateral arteries within the groups. ResultsThe degree of stenosis was not significantly different between the two subgroups (72% vs. 80%; P=0.09). In the reduced group compared to the preserved ICA flow group, a reduced BFR was found in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) (108{+/-}32 vs. 136{+/-}24 mL/min; P<0.01) and anterior cerebral artery (A1 segment) (-6{+/-}47 vs. 81{+/-}27 mL/min; P<0.001), while the BFR was increased in the contralateral A1 segment (152{+/-}79 vs. 82{+/-}41 mL/min; P<0.001). There was also a reversed BFR in the posterior communicating artery and ophthalmic artery on the ipsilateral side in the group with reduced ICA flow. BFR laterality was observed in all paired arteries in the reduced ICA flow group (P<0.05), while there was no laterality in the preserved ICA flow group (P>0.05). Conclusions4D-PCMRI revealed compromised cerebral blood flow in patients with carotid stenosis, not possible to detect by solely analyzing the stenosis degree. In patients with reduced ICA flow, collateral recruitment was not sufficient to maintain symmetrical BFR distribution to the two hemispheres.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Association Between The Posterior Part Of The Circle Of Willis And Vertebral Artery Hypoplasia 96%
- Consistency of superb microvascular imaging and contrast enhanced ultrasonography in detecting intraplaque neovascularization: a meta-analysis 94%
- Variations in the Circle of Willis in a large population sample using 3D TOF angiography: The Tromso Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long term stability of patients undergoing endovascular parent artery occlusion of their intracranial artery 95%
- Imaging cerebral arteries tortuosity and velocities by transcranial Doppler ultrasound is a reliable assessment of brain aneurysm in mouse models 95%
- Aneurysmal versus “Benign” Perimesencephalic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 94%
- Vascular Risk Factor Prevalence and Trends in Native Americans With Ischemic Stroke - A National Inpatient Sample Analysis 93%
- High fibrinogen-prealbumin ratio (FPR) predicts stroke-associated pneumonia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The ABCs of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Blood Volume Measurement: A Simplified Quantitative Method Predicts Outcomes and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia. 95%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 93%
- Evidence And Mechanisms For Embolic Stroke In Contralateral Hemispheres From Carotid Artery Sources 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.