Back

A Novel Collaborative Learning Model for Teeth and Fillings in Radiographs

Bumann, E. E.; Al-Qarni, S.; Chandrashekar, G.; Sabzian, R.; Bohaty, B.; Lee, Y.

2023-03-03 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2023.03.01.23286626 medRxiv
Show abstract

It is critical for dentists to identify and differentiate primary and permanent teeth, fillings, dental restorations and areas with pathological findings when reviewing dental radiographs to ensure that an accurate diagnosis is made and the optimal treatment can be planned. Unfortunately, dental radiographs are sometimes read incorrectly due to human error or low-quality images. While secondary or group review can help catch errors, many dentists work in practice alone and/or do not have time to review all of their patients radiographs with another dentist. Artificial intelligence may facilitate the accurate interpretation of radiographs. To help support the review of panoramic radiographs, we developed a novel collaborative learning model that simultaneously identifies and differentiates primary and permanent teeth and detects fillings. We used publicly accessible dental panoramic radiographic images and images obtained from the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Dentistry to develop and optimize two high-performance classifiers: (1) a system for tooth segmentation that can differentiate primary and permanent teeth and (2) a system to detect dental fillings. By utilizing these high-performance classifiers, we created models that can identify primary and permanent teeth, as well as their associated dental fillings. We also designed a novel method for collaborative learning that utilizes these two classifiers to enhance recognition performance. Our model improves upon the existing machine learning models to simultaneously identify and differentiate primary and permanent teeth, and to identify any associated fillings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.