Back

Development of a self-monitoring system for lung transplant patients using information and communication technology: a pilot study

Shinohara, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Muhammad, W.; Yanagiya, M.; Nagano, M.; Kitano, K.; Sato, M.; Konoeda, C.; Nakajima, J.

2023-03-01 transplantation
10.1101/2023.02.26.23285695 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLung transplantation is the final option for end-stage respiratory diseases. Postoperative monitoring of patients physical condition and performance of appropriate interventions for any abnormalities are important to improve the long-term success of lung transplantation. In Japan, patients handwritten self-management charts are widely used to record data for home spirometry, vital signs, and medication dosages. However, handwritten data are not suitable for assessment. We developed an internet-based real-time monitoring system (LT-FollowUp) that can easily assess patient data and detect any abnormalities that arise without delay. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the acceptability of LT-FollowUp to patients. MethodsThis was a prospective single-arm pilot cohort study. Lung transplant patients were recruited consecutively at regular outpatient visits from October 2020. Patients were instructed to enter their self-measurements (pulmonary functions and vital signs) and immunosuppressant dosages twice a day. Acceptability was assessed by the data filling rate. The changes in filling rate over time were evaluated using a linear mixed-effects model for repeated measurements. ResultsA total of 19 patients were included in the study. There were no significant differences in the filling rates between the handwritten charts and LT-FollowUp. ConclusionLT-FollowUp is an acceptable system for patients. Further development of the LT-FollowUp system may lead to better long-term clinical outcomes of lung transplantation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.