Event Rate and Predictors of Post-Acute COVID-19 Sequalae and the Average Time to Diagnosis in General Population
MUTHUKA, J. K.; M, C. M.; Mativo, J. N.; Nabaweesi, R.; Kiptoo, M. K.; Oluoch, K. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundPost- COVID-19 sequalae involves a variety of new, returning or ongoing symptoms that people experience more than four weeks after getting COVID-19. The aims of this meta-analysis were to assess the prevalence of Post-Acute COVID-19 sequalae and estimate the average time to its diagnosis; and meta-regress for possible moderators. MethodsA standard search strategy was used in PubMed, and then later modified according to each specific database. Search terms included "long COVID-19 or post-acute COVID-19 syndrome/sequalae". The criteria for inclusion were published clinical articles reporting the long COVID-19, further, the average time to diagnosis of post-acute COVID-19 sequelae among primary infected patients with COVID-19. Random-effects model was used. Rank Correlation and Eggers tests were used to ascertain publication bias. Sub-group, sensitivity and meta-regression analysis were conducted. A 95% confidence intervals were presented and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Review Manager 5.4 and comprehensive meta-analysis version 4 (CMA V4) were used for the analysis. The trial was PROSPERO registered (CRD42022328509). ResultsPrevalence of post-acute COVID-19 sequalae was 42.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 36 % to 49.3%). The PACS event rates range was 25 % at four months and 66 % at two months and mostly, signs and symptoms of PASC were experienced at three (54.3%, P < 0.0001) to six months (57%, P < 0.0001), further increasing at 12 months (57.9%, P= 0.0148). At an average of two months, however with the highest event rate (66%), it was not significantly associated with PACS diagnosis (P=0.08). On meta-regression, comorbidities collectively contributed to 14% of PACS with a non-significant correlation (Q = 7.05, df = 8, p = 0.5313) (R2=0.14). A cardiovascular disorder especially hypertension as a stand-alone, showed an event rate of 32% and significantly associated with PACS, 0.322 (95% CI 0.166, 0.532) (P < 0.001). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) and abnormal basal metabolic index (BMI) had higher event rates of PACS (59.8 % and 55.9 %) respectively, with a non-significant correlation (P > 0.05). With a significant association, hospital re-admission contributed to 17% (Q = 8.70, df = 1, p = 0.0032) (R2= 0.17) and the study design 26% (Q = 14.32, df = 3, p = 0.0025) (R2=0.26). All the covariates explained at least some of the variance in effect size on PACS at 53% (Q = 38.81, df = 19, p = 0.0047) (R2 analog = 0.53). ConclusionThe prevalence of PACS in general population was 42.5%, of which cardiovascular disorders were highly linked with it with COPD and abnormal BMI also being possible conditions found in patients with PACS. Hospital re-admission predicted highly, an experience of PACS as well as prospective study design. Clinical and methodological characteristics in a specific study contributed to over 50% of PACS events. The PACS event rates ranged between 25 % at four months and 66 % at two months with most signs and symptoms experienced between three to six months increasing at 12 months.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome? 95%
- Prognostic Value Of Comormidity For Severity Of COVID-19: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for severe outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review 95%
- Risk factors for severity on admission and the disease progression during hospitalization in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients in Japan 95%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for COVID-19 in Intensive Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review 94%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital services for patients with cardiac diseases: a scoping review 94%
- Are Geographic Factors Associated With Poorer Outcomes In Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: Ongoing symptomatic phase vs. post-COVID-19 syndrome 95%
- Early Outpatient Treatment Of COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis Of 392 Cases In Italy 94%
- Efficacy of remdesivir-containing therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a prospective clinical experience 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.