Sex-specific Morphometric Analysis of Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch for Planning Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
Katsarou, M.; Mandigers, T. J.; Berczeli, M.; Zubair, M. M.; Belvroy, V. M.; Schwein, A.; Bissacco, D.; van Herwaarden, J. A.; Trimarchi, S.; Bismuth, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn many studies on aortic disease women are underrepresented. The present study aims to assess sex-specific morphometric differences and gain more insight into endovascular treatment of the AA and arch. MethodsElectrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomography scans of 116 patients who were evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve replacement were retrospectively reviewed. Measurements of the AA and aortic arch were made in multiplanar views, perpendicular to the semi-automatic centerline. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors affecting AA and aortic arch diameter in men and women. Propensity score matching was used to investigate whether sex influences aortic morphology. ResultsIn both sexes, body surface area (BSA) was identified as a positive predictor and diabetes as a negative predictor for aortic diameters. In men, age was identified as a positive predictor and smoking as a negative predictor for aortic diameters. Propensity score matching identified 40 pairs. Systolic and diastolic mean diameters and AA length were significantly wider in men. On average, male aortas were 7,4% wider compared to female aortas, both in systole and diastole. ConclusionsThe present analysis demonstrates that, in women, increased BSA is associated with increased aortic arch diameters, while diabetes is associated to decreased AA and arch diameters. In men, increased body surface area and age are associated to increased AA and arch diameters, while smoking and diabetes are associated to decreased AA and arch diameters. Men were confirmed to have 7.4% greater AA and arch diameters than women.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of low versus high inspired oxygen fraction on myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomized clinical trial 95%
- Preventive training interferes with mRNA-encoding myosin 7 and collagen I expression during pulmonary arterial hypertension 95%
- Development of a Novel Index to Characterise Arterial Dynamics Using Ultrasound Imaging 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient Screening for Self-Expanding Percutaneous Pulmonary Valves using Virtual Reality 95%
- iCPET calculator: a web-based application to standardize the calculation of alpha distensibility in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension 93%
- Influence of Sex and Race/ Ethnicity on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Large Integrated Healthcare System 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamics with Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Using a Cardiogenic Shock Model 95%
- Decreased Diastolic Hydraulic Forces Incrementally Associate With Survival Beyond Conventional Measures of Diastolic Dysfunction 94%
- Evaluation of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) used to demonstrate the aortic annulus on cardiac CT 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplex immunohistochemistry differences between Q fever and atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms indicate immune suppression 92%
- Cardiac electrophysiological remodeling associated with enhanced arrhythmia susceptibility in a canine model of elite exercise 92%
- Utility of estimated pulse wave velocity for assessing vascular stiffness: comparison of methods 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Results of the inoperable and operable with aortic valve endocarditis 95%
- Cardiovascular Hemodynamics in Mice with Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor - Associated Factor 2 Mediated Cytoprotection in the Heart 94%
- Mid-term subclinical myocardial injury detection in patients recovered from COVID-19 according pulmonary lesion severity 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.