Active methods, and their educational strategies during residencies of health professions: a scope review
Garcia, V. L.; Soeriro, E.; de Oliveira, J. M.; Schiesari, L. M. C.; Gomes, R.; Riera, R.
Show abstract
The objective of this study is to map and evaluate the scientific production, on the different strategies / active methods in the context of residences of health professions. The study will be developed at Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, Brazil. The scope review will be developed based on the methodological framework of the Joanna Brigss Institute (Peters et al., 2017). The review report will follow recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA ScR) (Tricco, 2018). The protocol for this review was planned and made available on the MEdRxiv preprint database prior to the start of conducting the review. The following research question will guide for searching in databases: What and how are the different active methods used in the context of residencies of health professions? A broad and sensitive search will be carried out in the literature through structured search strategies, with relevant descriptors and synonyms, for the following databases or data repositories in the areas of education and/or health listed below: Biblioteca Virtual de Saude (BVS), British Education Index (BEI), Campbell Collaboration, Cochrane Library (via Wiley), Education Research Complete (via EBSCO), Educational Resources Information Center - ERIC, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE, via Elsevier), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE, via PubMed), Online Education Database.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 96%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- The Use of Machine Learning in Occupational Risk Communication for Healthcare Workers – Protocol for scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 96%
- Exploring Perceptions, Challenges, and Opportunities of UDS Health Professionals' Students and Faculty Regarding Community-Based Education Programs for Interprofessional Education-A study protocol. 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 95%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 93%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 91%
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 89%
- Cancer risk perception and knowledge and physician communication behaviors: specific influences on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening in women 50-65 years old 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- A protocol for a systematic critical realist synthesis of school mindfulness interventions designed to promote pupils’ mental wellbeing 93%
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.