Back

ANALYSIS OF RIFAMPICIN INDETERMINATE RESULTS USING SHEWHART CONTROL CHARTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENTS AND TUBERCULOSIS CONTROL Programs

Abaate, T. J.; Alali, A. A.

2023-02-24 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2023.02.21.22282624 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a growing global public health concern, and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is responsible for roughly one-quarter of all antimicrobial-resistant infection-related deaths worldwide. GeneXpert is a rapid, automated molecular test that detects multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis using rifampicin as a predictor. It was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010 for national tuberculosis programs in developing countries; however, it has limitations. Indeterminate results for Mycobacterium tuberculosis indicate that the test was unable to determine whether the bacteria were resistant to rifampicin. This study used Shewhart Control Chart, which has action limits, to investigate the causes of indeterminate results. MethodsThe control limits on the Shewhart chart are central, upper, and lower. GeneXpert indeterminate results obtained between January 2017 and December 2020 in a tertiary hospital in a low and middle-income country were plotted. Points above the upper control limit were used to determine whether or not the process was under control. ResultThe proportion of GeneXpert results that were indeterminate varied, with 58% exceeding the upper limit. Only 42% were within the control limit, in comparison. The majority of the laboratory results revealed an out-of-control signal by displaying points outside the control limits or non-random patterns of points known as special-cause variation, according to this study. ConclusionsGeneXpert indeterminate results have an impact on patient management by preventing accurate diagnosis and delaying the start of anti-tuberculosis medication. Machine malfunctions, insufficient bacterial load, poor quality samples, operator errors, or faulty laboratory materials could all be to blame. Regular equipment checks by laboratory personnel, program sponsors, or leadership will be extremely beneficial in achieving the desired results and initiating appropriate treatment. Statistical process control is widely used in hospital performance monitoring and improvement, and it is becoming more popular in public health surveillance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
12
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
18
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%