The Snoring Survivors
OGBU, I. R.; Hakobyan, MD, B.; Sossou, C.; Levisman, MD, J.; Obiagwu, C.; Danielian, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe routine administration of supplemental oxygen to non-hypoxic patients with acute myocardial infarction has been abandoned for lack of mortality benefit. However, the benefits of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use in patients hospitalized with acute cardiovascular disease and concomitant obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remain to be elucidated. MethodsUsing ICD-10-CM codes, we searched the 2016-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample for patients diagnosed with unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (AFRVR), who also carried a diagnosis of OSA. We identified in-hospital CPAP use with ICD-10-PCS codes. In-hospital death, length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges were compared between patients with and without OSA, and between OSA patients with and without CPAP use. ResultsOur sample included 2,959,991 patients, of which 1.5% were diagnosed with UA, 30.3% with AMI, 37.5% with ADHF, and 45.8% with AF. OSA was present in 12.3%. Patients with OSA were more likely to be younger, male, smokers, obese, have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure, and heart failure (p < 0.001 for all). Patients with OSA had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.71, 95% CI [0.7-0.73]). Among patients with OSA, CPAP use significantly increased the odds of in-hospital death (aOR: 1.51, 95% CI [1.44-1.60]), LOS (adjusted mean difference of 1.49 days, 95% CI [1.43, 1.55]), and hospital charges (adjusted mean difference of $1168, 95% CI [273, 2062]). ConclusionOur study showed that patients with recognized OSA and hospitalized for AMI, ADHF or AFRVR, who were not treated with CPAP, had significantly lower in-hospital mortality and resource utilization.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 94%
- Insomnia and early incident atrial fibrillation: A 16-year cohort study of younger men and women Veterans 94%
- Effectiveness of an Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 96%
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 94%
- Prognostic significance of BMI after PCI treatment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction A cohort study from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 94%
- Sex Differences in Pulmonary Hypertension and Associated Right Ventricular Dysfunction 93%
- Higher mortality in male patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy appears to be related to higher complication rates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 96%
- Association of Heart Failure Subtypes and Atrial fibrillation: Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study 94%
- Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support utilization, Left Ventricular Assist Device implantation and Transplant during Cardiogenic Shock Hospitalizations, after the New Heart Allocation Policy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Advanced Therapy Centers on Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions 95%
- Obesity Modifies Clinical Outcomes of Right Ventricular Dysfunction 95%
- Diastolic Perfusion Pressure Predicts Response to Inotropes/Vasopressors and Benefit from Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock? 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.