Back

Re-weighting MC1R, ASIP and IRF4 risk variants optimises polygenic risk scores for keratinocyte cancer stratification in solid organ transplant recipients.

Seviiri, M.; Law, M. H.; Olsen, C. M.; Whiteman, D. C.; Green, A. C.; MacGregor, S.

2023-02-18 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.02.17.23286114 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionSolid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at much higher risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC), compared to the general population. Previous studies have derived genetics-based predictors (polygenic risk scores, PRS) of SCC and BCC risk in SOTRs by assuming that genetic risk variants act in the same way in the general population as in SOTRs, but this assumption has not been fully tested. ObjectiveTo investigate whether known genetic risk variants for SCC and BCC have different effect sizes in SOTRs versus in non-transplantees, and if a re-weighted PRS would improve risk prediction. MethodsWe conducted genome-wide association studies for SCC and BCC separately in the non-transplant general population and in SOTRs, and compared the risks associated with selected common genetic variants for KC risk in SOTR vs non-transplant individuals from the UK Biobank. For regions with an increased log odds ratio in SOTRs, PRSs including these weights were validated in the QSkin study, and applied to the Australian STAR SOTR cohort. ResultsEffect sizes for functional variants in MC1R (rs1805007), ASIP (rs6059655), and IRF4 (rs12203592) were much more strongly associated with the risk of KC in SOTRs than in non-transplantees. The proportional increase in the effect sizes ranged from 1.9-fold for rs6059655 and BCC risk (SOTRs log (OR)=0.49, 95%CI=0.00-0.98 vs log (OR)=0.26, 95%CI=0.24-0.30 in non-transplantees) to as high as 4.8-fold for rs1805007 and SCC risk (SOTR log (OR)=0.88, 95% CI=0.41-1.35 vs log (OR)=0.18, 95% CI=0.12-0.24 in non-transplantees). PRS with SOTR derived weights for these SNPs showed improved SCC/BCC risk stratification in the STAR Cohort, with the optimised PRS reclassifying 19% of SCC cases vs 8% using the standard PRS, and 18% of BCC cases vs 12% using the standard PRS. ConclusionEffect sizes for SCC and BCC risk for genetic variants in the MC1R, ASIP and IRF4 genes are elevated in SOTRs, and correctly weighting these variants improves risk stratification based on polygenic risk.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Dermatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.3%
4
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
5
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Kidney International Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
24
Genetics in Medicine Open
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
27
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
28
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
29
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%