Re-weighting MC1R, ASIP and IRF4 risk variants optimises polygenic risk scores for keratinocyte cancer stratification in solid organ transplant recipients.
Seviiri, M.; Law, M. H.; Olsen, C. M.; Whiteman, D. C.; Green, A. C.; MacGregor, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionSolid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at much higher risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC), compared to the general population. Previous studies have derived genetics-based predictors (polygenic risk scores, PRS) of SCC and BCC risk in SOTRs by assuming that genetic risk variants act in the same way in the general population as in SOTRs, but this assumption has not been fully tested. ObjectiveTo investigate whether known genetic risk variants for SCC and BCC have different effect sizes in SOTRs versus in non-transplantees, and if a re-weighted PRS would improve risk prediction. MethodsWe conducted genome-wide association studies for SCC and BCC separately in the non-transplant general population and in SOTRs, and compared the risks associated with selected common genetic variants for KC risk in SOTR vs non-transplant individuals from the UK Biobank. For regions with an increased log odds ratio in SOTRs, PRSs including these weights were validated in the QSkin study, and applied to the Australian STAR SOTR cohort. ResultsEffect sizes for functional variants in MC1R (rs1805007), ASIP (rs6059655), and IRF4 (rs12203592) were much more strongly associated with the risk of KC in SOTRs than in non-transplantees. The proportional increase in the effect sizes ranged from 1.9-fold for rs6059655 and BCC risk (SOTRs log (OR)=0.49, 95%CI=0.00-0.98 vs log (OR)=0.26, 95%CI=0.24-0.30 in non-transplantees) to as high as 4.8-fold for rs1805007 and SCC risk (SOTR log (OR)=0.88, 95% CI=0.41-1.35 vs log (OR)=0.18, 95% CI=0.12-0.24 in non-transplantees). PRS with SOTR derived weights for these SNPs showed improved SCC/BCC risk stratification in the STAR Cohort, with the optimised PRS reclassifying 19% of SCC cases vs 8% using the standard PRS, and 18% of BCC cases vs 12% using the standard PRS. ConclusionEffect sizes for SCC and BCC risk for genetic variants in the MC1R, ASIP and IRF4 genes are elevated in SOTRs, and correctly weighting these variants improves risk stratification based on polygenic risk.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A multi-phenotype analysis reveals 19 novel susceptibility loci for basal cell carcinoma and 15 for squamous cell carcinoma 94%
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer: 2,094 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers 92%
- Cutaneous and acral melanoma cross-OMICs reveals prognostic cancer drivers associated with pathobiology and ultraviolet exposure 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical case study meets population cohort: Identification of a BRCA1 pathogenic founder variant in Orcadians 91%
- An expanded analysis framework for multivariate GWAS connects inflammatory biomarkers to functional variants and disease 91%
- Limitations in next-generation sequencing-based genotyping of breast cancer polygenic risk score loci 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinically relevant combined effect of polygenic background, rare pathogenic germline variants, and family history on colorectal cancer incidence 91%
- Exome-wide analysis of copy number variation shows association of the human leukocyte antigen region with asthma in UK Biobank 90%
- Modifiable lifestyle factors and severe COVID-19 risk: Evidence from Mendelian randomization analysis 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.