A 10-year review of antihypertensive prescribing practices after stroke and the associated disparities from the Florida Stroke Registry.
Gordon Perue, G. L.; Ying, H.; Bustillo, A. J.; Zhou, L.; Gutierrez, C. M.; Wang, K.; Gardener, H.; krigman, j.; Jameson, A. M.; Foster, D.; Dong, C.; Rundek, T.; Rose, D. Z.; Romano, J. G.; Alkhachroum, A.; Sacco, R.; Asdaghi, N.; Koch, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundGuideline based hypertension management is integral to the prevention of stroke. We examine trends in antihypertensive medications prescribed after stroke and assess how well a prescribers blood pressure medication choice adheres to clinical practice guidelines (Prescribers-Choice Adherence). MethodsThe Florida Stroke registry (FSR) utilizes statewide data prospectively collected for all acute stroke admissions. Based on established guidelines we defined optimal Prescribers-Choice Adherence using the following hierarchy of rules: 1) use of an angiotensin inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) as first-line antihypertensive among diabetics; 2) use of thiazide-type diuretics or calcium channel blockers (CCB) among African-American patients; 3) use of beta-adrenergic blockers (BB) among patients with compelling cardiac indication (CCI) 4) use of thiazide, ACEI/ARB or CCB class as first-line in all others; 5) BB should be avoided as first line unless CCI. RESULTSA total of 372,254 cases from January 2010 to March 2020 are in FSR with a diagnosis of acute ischemic, hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack or subarachnoid hemorrhage; 265,409 with complete data were included in the final analysis. Mean age 70 +/-14 years, 50% female, index stroke subtype of 74% acute ischemic stroke and 11% intracerebral hemorrhage. Prescribers-Choice Adherence to each specific rule ranged from 48-74% which is below quality standards of 85%. There were race-ethnic disparities with only 49% Prescribers choice Adherence for African Americans patients. ConclusionThis large dataset demonstrates consistently low rates of Prescribers-Choice Adherence over 10 years. There is an opportunity for quality improvement in hypertensive management after stroke.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Risk Factor Prevalence and Trends in Native Americans With Ischemic Stroke - A National Inpatient Sample Analysis 96%
- Usage of Mineralocorticoids and Isotonic Crystalloids in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients in the United States 94%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 95%
- Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the U.S.: Results from the NIS 95%
- A Claims-Based Machine Learning Classifier of Modified Rankin Scale in Acute Ischemic Stroke 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidence and Risk of Post-COVID-19 Thromboembolic Disease and the Impact of Aspirin Prescription; Nationwide Observational Cohort at the US Department of Veteran Affairs 93%
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced and Interpretable Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care 93%
- Association of Mortality and Aspirin Prescription for COVID-19 Patients at the Veterans Health Administration 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smoking does not alter treatment effect of intravenous thrombolysis in mild to moderate acute ischemic stroke; a Dutch String-of-Pearls Institute (PSI) Stroke Study 93%
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 93%
- Associations between cardiovascular risk factors, stroke severity, and post-stroke cognition: a moderated mediation analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.