Back

Identifying Body Awareness-Related Brain Network Changes after Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation for Neuropathic Pain Relief in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: Delayed Treatment arm Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial

Van de Winckel, A.; Carpentier, S. T.; Deng, W.; Bottale, S.; Zhang, L.; Hendrickson, T.; Linnman, C.; Lim, K. O.; Mueller, B. A.; Philippus, A.; Monden, K. R.; Wudlick, R.; Battaglino, R.; Morse, L. R.

2023-02-10 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2023.02.09.23285713 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNeuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is notoriously hard to treat. Mechanisms of neuropathic pain are unclear, which makes finding effective treatments challenging. Prior studies have shown that adults with SCI have body awareness deficits. Recent imaging studies, including ours, point to the parietal operculum and insula as key areas for both pain perception and body awareness. Cognitive multisensory rehabilitation (CMR) is a physical therapy approach that helps improve body awareness for pain reduction and sensorimotor recovery. Based on our prior brain imaging work in CMR in stroke, we hypothesized that improving body awareness through restoring parietal operculum network connectivity leads to neuropathic pain relief and improved sensorimotor and daily life function in adults with SCI. Thus, the objectives of this study were to (1) determine baseline differences in resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain function in adults with SCI compared to healthy controls and (2) identify changes in brain function and behavioral pain and pain-associated outcomes in adults with SCI after CMR. MethodsHealthy adults underwent a one-time MRI scan and completed questionnaires. We recruited community-dwelling adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain, with complete or incomplete SCI >3 months, and highest neuropathic pain intensity level of >3 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Participants with SCI were randomized into two groups, according to a delayed treatment arm phase I randomized controlled trial (RCT): Group A immediately received CMR intervention, 3x/week, 45 min/session, followed by a 6-week and 1-year follow-up. Group B started with a 6-week observation period, then 6 weeks of CMR, and a 1-year follow-up. Highest, average, and lowest neuropathic pain intensity levels were assessed weekly with the NPRS as primary outcome. Other primary outcomes (fMRI resting-state and functional tasks; sensory and motor function with the INSCI AIS exam), as well as secondary outcomes (mood, function, spasms, and other SCI secondary conditions), were assessed at baseline, after the first and second 6-week period. The INSCI AIS exam and questionnaires were repeated at the 1-year follow-up. FindingsThirty-six healthy adults and 28 adults with SCI were recruited between September 2020 and August 2021, and of those, 31 healthy adults and 26 adults with SCI were enrolled in the study. All 26 participants with SCI completed the intervention and pre-post assessments. There were no study-related adverse events. Participants were 52{+/-}15 years of age, and 1-56 years post-SCI. During the observation period, group B did not show any reductions in neuropathic pain and did not have any changes in sensation or motor function (INSCI ASIA exam). However, both groups experienced a significant reduction in neuropathic pain after the 6-week CMR intervention. Their highest level of neuropathic pain of 7.81{+/-}1.33 on the NPRS at baseline was reduced to 2.88{+/-}2.92 after 6 weeks of CMR. Their change scores were 4.92{+/-}2.92 (large effect size Cohens d=1.68) for highest neuropathic pain, 4.12{+/-}2.23 (d=1.85) for average neuropathic pain, and 2.31{+/-}2.07 (d=1.00) for lowest neuropathic pain. Nine participants out of 26 were pain-free after the intervention (34.62%). The results of the INSCI AIS testing also showed significant improvements in sensation, muscle strength, and function after 6 weeks of CMR. Their INSCI AIS exam increased by 8.81{+/-}5.37 points (d=1.64) for touch sensation, 7.50{+/-}4.89 points (d=1.53) for pin prick sensation, and 3.87{+/-}2.81 (d=1.38) for lower limb muscle strength. Functional improvements after the intervention included improvements in balance for 17 out of 18 participants with balance problems at baseline; improved transfers for all of them and a returned ability to stand upright with minimal assistance in 12 out of 20 participants who were unable to stand at baseline. Those improvements were maintained at the 1-year follow-up. With regard to brain imaging, we confirmed that the resting-state parietal operculum and insula networks had weaker connections in adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain (n=20) compared to healthy adults (n=28). After CMR, stronger resting-state parietal operculum network connectivity was found in adults with SCI. Also, at baseline, as expected, right toe sensory stimulation elicited less brain activation in adults with SCI (n=22) compared to healthy adults (n=26). However, after CMR, there was increased brain activation in relevant sensorimotor and parietal areas related to pain and mental body representations (i.e., body awareness and visuospatial body maps) during the toe stimulation fMRI task. These brain function improvements aligned with the AIS results of improved touch sensation, including in the feet. InterpretationAdults with chronic SCI had significant neuropathic pain relief and functional improvements, attributed to the recovery of sensation and movement after CMR. The results indicate the preliminary efficacy of CMR for restoring function in adults with chronic SCI. CMR is easily implementable in current physical therapy practice. These encouraging impressive results pave the way for larger randomized clinical trials aimed at testing the efficacy of CMR to alleviate neuropathic pain in adults with SCI. Clinical Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04706208 FundingAIRP2-IND-30: Academic Investment Research Program (AIRP) University of Minnesota School of Medicine. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health Award Number UL1TR002494; the Biotechnology Research Center: P41EB015894, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders & Stroke Institutional Center Core Grants to Support Neuroscience Research: P30 NS076408; and theHigh-Performancee Connectome Upgrade for Human 3T MR Scanner: 1S10OD017974.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
The Journal of Pain
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
5
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
8
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
11
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
12
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
23
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Neurobiology of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%