Back

Effects of supervised exercises on pain and disability in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

MAPINDUZI, J.; Ndacayisaba, G.; Mitchai, P. M.; BONNECHERE, B.; Kossi, O.

2023-02-11 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2023.02.09.23285694 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHip and knee osteoarthritis are among the most prevalent and disabling conditions affecting mainly older adults, with a risk of undergoing a total hip or knee replacement for the end stage. Increasing recommendations of conservative treatments have been reported as the first-line strategy for the initial management of this condition. ObjectiveThis review sought to investigate the effects of supervised exercises versus non-pharmacological conservative therapies to reduce pain and disability levels on patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. MethodsThree databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect) were systematically searched for randomized-controlled trials published between 01-01-2001 and 31-10-2022. PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The PRISMA guidelines were applied for this review. ResultsTwelve randomized-controlled trials of moderate-to-high quality were included in this review. The studies involved 1,049 participants with a mean age (SD) of 64 (6) years old. The duration of the intervention and follow-up varied from 2 weeks to 16 months. Supervised exercises for hip or knee osteoarthritis were significantly less effective in terms of pain reduction (SMD=-0.40 [95%CI 0.16, 0.65], p=0.001) compared to home-based exercises (active musculoskeletal therapies), but not in terms of disability reduction (SMD=-0.04[95%CI -0.43, 0.36], p=0.86). There was a non-significant difference of supervised exercises compared to passive musculoskeletal therapies in terms of disability (SMD=0.21[95%CI -0.09, 0.50], p=0.17), or pain reduction (SMD=-0.19; [95%CI -0.57, 0.19], p=0.33). ConclusionSupervised exercises were found to be less effective in reducing pain, but not in disability reduction when compared to home-based exercises. Systematic review registrationProspero CRD42021271912

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.