Ethnic differences of genetic risk and smoking in lung cancer: two prospective cohort studies
Zhu, M.; Lv, J.; Huang, Y.; Ma, H.; Li, N.; Wei, X.; Ji, M.; Ma, Z.; Song, C.; Wang, C.; Dai, J.; Tan, F.; Guo, Y.; Walters, R.; Millwood, I.; Hung, R. J.; Christiani, D. C.; Yu, C.; Jin, G.; Chen, Z.; Wei, Q.; Amos, C. I.; Hu, Z.; Li, L.; Shen, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe relative risk of smoking on lung cancer have been reported to be much higher in white population than that in East Asians. However, its unknown whether genetic background underlies this disparity between ethnic groups. To assess the role of ethnic differences in genetic factors associated with this phenomenon. MethodsWe first constructed ethnic-specific polygenic risk scores (PRSs) to quantify individual genetic risk of lung cancer in Chinese and white populations. Then, we compared genetic risk and smoking as well as their interactions on lung cancer between two cohorts, including the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) and the UK Biobank (UKB). We also evaluated the absolute risk reduction over a 5-year period. Results19 SNPs and 23 SNPs were identified to construct the PRSs in Chinese and white populations, and smoking-related loci were only included in white populations. The PRSs were consistently associated with lung cancer risk respectively, but stronger associations were observed in smokers of the UKB (HR 1.26 versus 1.15, P=0.028). A significant interaction between genetic risk and smoking on lung cancer was observed in the UKB (RERI, 11.39 [95% CI, 7.01-17.94]), but not in the CKB. By comparing heavy smokers with nonsmokers, a greater absolute risk reduction was found in the UKB (10.95 versus 7.12 per 1000 person-years, P<0.001), especially for those at high genetic risk. ConclusionsIn China, tobacco control alone is not enough to reduce the burden of lung cancer, and comprehensive policies should be made to lower its high incidence.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Asian Lung Cancer Absolute Risk Models for lung cancer mortality based on China Kadoorie Biobank 96%
- Genetic analysis of lung cancer reveals novel susceptibility loci and germline impact on somatic mutation burden 94%
- Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Cancer Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for 17 Cancer Types in Two Large Cohorts 94%
- Context-aware single-cell multiome approach identified cell-type specific lung cancer susceptibility genes 93%
- Prediction and stratification of longitudinal risk for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease across smoking behaviors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthy lifestyle, genetic risk, and incidence of cancer: A prospective cohort study of 13 cancer types 94%
- Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer in Korean women 90%
- Causal relationships between risk of venous thromboembolism and 18 cancers: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spirometric classifications of COPD severity as predictive markers for clinical outcomes: the HUNT Study 92%
- Investigating associations of omega-3 fatty acids, lung function decline, and airway obstruction 91%
- A MUC5B gene polymorphism, rs35705950-T, confers protective effects in COVID-19 infection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methylation scores for smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index and risk of seven types of cancer 92%
- Associations of plasma omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids with overall and 19 site-specific cancers: a population-based cohort study in UK Biobank 91%
- Developing and validating polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer risk prediction in East Asians 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.