A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of oral RP7214, a DHODH inhibitor, in Patients with Symptomatic Mild SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Nair, A.; Barde, P.; Routhu, K. V.; Vakkalanka, S.; RP7214-2101 Study Group Investigator Authors (India),
Show abstract
IntroductionCOVID-19 pandemic due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is of immense global public health concern. RP7214, a novel, potent, oral, inhibitor of DHODH, has shown preclinical evidence in inhibiting viral replication and lung inflammation. MethodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study in patients with symptomatic mild SARS-CoV-2 infection, having at least one high-risk feature (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus) for developing severe Covid-19 infection. The patients received RP7214 (400 mg BID) or a placebo for 14 days in a blinded fashion and were followed up to 30 days. Patients also received supportive therapy (e.g., antipyretics and antitussives for symptomatic relief) at the discretion of the investigator. The endpoints were Covid 19 related hospitalization rate by Day 15, SARS-CoV-2 viral load and clearance on Days 3,7 and 15, clinical symptoms improvement by Day 15, safety, and the immuno-modulatory effect of RP7214. ResultsA total of 163 patients were treated in the study; 82 received RP7214 and 81 received placebo. Of the total patients, 44.2% had received Covid-19 vaccine prior to the study. The symptom onset was [≤] 3 days in 22.1%. None of the patients in the study required hospitalization. There was no difference in the mean change of viral load between RP7214 and placebo. In the subgroup analysis, in patients having symptom onset of [≤] 3 days, RP7214 significantly reduced viral load on Days 3 and 7, respectively. Similarly, in non-vaccinated patients with symptom onset of [≤] 3 days, RP7214 significantly reduced viral load on Day 3. Overall, there was a trend towards better viral load reduction in RP7214-treated patients with a baseline viral load of 5 log units or higher. For all other endpoints, there was no difference between RP7214 and placebo. Majority of the reported AEs were mild and not related either to study treatment. ConclusionsRP7214 at 400 mg BID dose level showed a statistically significant reduction in viral load at an early stage of the disease and in non-vaccinated patients. There was a trend towards better viral load reduction in RP7214-treated patients with a baseline viral load of 5 log units or higher. RP7214 showed a favorable safety profile. Further development of RP7214 in Covid 19 in a mild symptomatic population with co-morbidities and treated at an early stage of disease may show benefit.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The wide spectrum anti-inflammatory activity of andrographolide in comparison to NSAIDs: a promising therapeutic compound against the cytokine storm 94%
- Supporting Respiratory Epithelia and Lowering Inflammation to Effectively Treat Common Cold Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of Long COVID among diagnosed cases of COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19, A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. 96%
- A shorter symptom-onset to remdesivir treatment (SORT) interval is associated with a lower mortality in moderate-to-severe COVID-19: A real-world analysis 94%
- Impact of Antibody Cocktail Therapy Combined with Casirivimab and Imdevimab on Clinical Outcome for Covid-19 patients in A Real-Life Setting: A Single Institute Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 97%
- Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial to study co-administration of Ashwagandha on safety, immunogenicity, and protection with COVID-19 vaccine – A Study Protocol 96%
- Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide combined with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atovaquone for Treatment of COVID-19: A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial 96%
- Echinacea purpurea for the Long-term Prevention of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized, Open, Controlled, Exploratory Clinical Study 95%
- Innovative, rapid, high throughput method for drug repurposing in a pandemic - a case study of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety, Virology, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Experience of High-dose Intravenous Sotrovimab for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate COVID-19: An Open-label Clinical Trial 94%
- Homologous and heterologous boosting of the ChAdOx1-S1-S COVID-19 vaccine with the SCB-2019 vaccine candidate: a randomized, observer-blinded, controlled, phase 2 study 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of remdesivir and dexamethasone for COVID-19 treatment in South Africa 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.