Back

A Zika virus-responsive sensor-effector system in Aedes aegypti

Basu, S.; Reitmayer, C. M.; Lumley, S.; Atkinson, B.; Schade-Weskott, M. L.; Rooney, S.; Larner, W.; Montiel, E. E.; Gutierrez-Lopez, R.; Levitt, E.; Munyanduki, H. M.; Elrefaey, A. M. E.; Clarke, A. T.; Koit, S.; Zusinaite, E.; Fragkoudis, R.; Merits, A.; Alphey, L.

2023-02-06 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.02.06.527261 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) is a recently re-emerged flavivirus transmitted primarily through the bite of an infected mosquito, Aedes aegypti being the main vector. ZIKV infection is associated with a range of adverse effects; infection during pregnancy can lead to foetal abnormalities, including microcephaly. Lacking a licensed vaccine, or specific therapeutics, control of ZIKV transmission focuses on vector control. However, in most transmission settings, current methods are insufficient to successfully control ZIKV, or other similarly-transmitted arboviruses such as dengue and chikungunya viruses. This has stimulated interest in genetics-based methods, either to reduce the number of mosquitoes ("population suppression"), or to make mosquitoes less able to transmit ("population modification"). Here, we describe a method to selectively eliminate infected mosquitoes, using a virus sensor inserted into the mosquito genome and coupled to a quorum-counting lethal effector. In mosquitoes, ZIKV normally establishes persistent, lifelong infection; survival of these infected mosquitoes is crucial to transmission potential. Correspondingly, removal of infected mosquitoes can reduce vectorial capacity of a mosquito population, i.e. ability to transmit. Since relatively few mosquitoes become infected, typically <2%, engineered hypersensitivity to ZIKV would have only a modest population-level fitness cost, and lower still if transmission were successfully reduced by such means.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.