Development of a mobile laboratory system in hydrogen fuel cell buses and evaluation of the performance for COVID-19
Okude, M.; Suzuki, K.; Naito, A.; Ebashi, A.; Kusama, T.; Kiyotaki, J.; Akashi, Y.; Kiyasu, Y.; Kurihara, Y.; Notake, S.; Takansahi, M.; Setoyama, T.; Kawakami, Y.; Suzuki, H.
Show abstract
IntroductionWe newly designed and developed two types of hydrogen fuel cell (HFC) buses (motorcoach type and minibus type) with a mobile laboratory system. Feasibility studies have been performed for mobile laboratory testing, especially for the laboratory performance of COVID-19 RT-PCR (PCR). MethodsWe evaluated the driving range capability, PCR sample size capacity, turn-around time (TAT), and analytical performance for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Saliva samples were used for the current research and the analytical performance was compared with reference PCR. ResultsThe estimated driving range and sample size capacity were 432 km and 3,258 samples, respectively for the HFC motorcoach and 313 km and 2,146 samples for the HFC minibus, respectively. For the TAT, the median time between the sample submission and the completion of PCR were 86 min for the motorcoach and 76 min for the minibus, and the median time between sample submission and the electronic reporting of the result to each visitor were 182 min for the motorcoach and 194 min for the minibus. A secondary analysis of 1,574 HFC mobile laboratory testing samples was conducted and all negative samples were negative by reference PCR. Furthermore, all positive samples were confirmed as positive by reference PCR or other molecular examinations. ConclusionWe confirmed the feasibility of HFC mobile laboratory systems for achieving the rapid reporting of highly accurate PCR results.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Evaluation of AccuPower® COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower® SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples 93%
- Air and surface measurements of SARS-CoV-2 inside a bus during normal operation 93%
- Evaluation of GENECUBE ® HQ SARS-CoV-2 for anterior nasal samples and saliva samples with a new rapid examination protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic performance of a novel digital immunoassay (RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2): a prospective observational study with 1,127 nasopharyngeal samples 92%
- Clinical Evaluation of the Novel Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Point-of-Care Test (Smart Gene SARS-CoV-2) in the analysis of Nasopharyngeal and Anterior Nasal samples 91%
- Evaluation and clinical implications of the time to a positive results of antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low-cost, local production of a safe and effective disinfectant for resource-constrained communities 92%
- Academic institution extensive, building-by-building wastewater-based surveillance platform for SARS-CoV-2 monitoring, clinical data correlation, and potential national proxy 91%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Actual Conditions of Person-to-Object Contact and a Proposal for Prevention Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic 91%
- VarLOCK - sequencing independent, rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern for point-of-care testing, qPCR pipelines and national wastewater surveillance 91%
- Validation of a rapid, saliva-based, and ultra-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 screening system for a pandemic-scale infection surveillance 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pilot program for test-based SARS-CoV-2 screening and environmental monitoring in an urban public school district 92%
- Restrictions on top speed and nighttime usage substantially decrease the incidence of electric scooter injuries 90%
- Adequacy of serial self-performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen-detection testing for longitudinal mass screening in the workplace 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.