Back

Real-world effectiveness of Azvudine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

Shen, M.; Xiao, C.; Sun, Y.; Li, D.; Wu, P.; Jin, L.; Wu, Q.; Dian, Y.; Meng, Y.; Zeng, F.; Chen, X.; Deng, G.

2023-01-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.01.23.23284899 medRxiv
Show abstract

Current guidelines prioritize the use of the Azvudine in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, the clinical effectiveness of Azvudine in real-world studies was lacking, despite the clinical trials showed shorter time of nucleic acid negative conversion. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness following Azvudine treatment in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, we identified 1505 hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the study period, with a follow-up of up to 29 days. After exclusions and propensity score matching, we included 226 Azvudine recipients and 226 matched controls. The lower crude incidence rate of composite disease progression outcome (4.21 vs. 10.39 per 1000 person-days, P=0.041) and all-cause mortality (1.57 vs. 6.00 per 1000 person-days, P=0.027) were observed among Azvudine recipients compared with matched controls. The incidence rates of initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation were also statistically different between the groups according to the log-rank tests (P=0.020). Azvudine treatment was associated with significantly lower risks of composite disease progression outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18 to 0.99) and all-cause death (HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.94) compared with matched controls. Subgroup analyses indicated robustness of the point estimates of HRs (ranged from 0.14 to 0.84). Notably, male Azvudine recipients had a stronger effectiveness than female recipients with respect to both composite outcome and all-cause death. These findings suggest that Azvudine treatment showed substantial clinical benefits in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and should be considered for use in this population of patients.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
3
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.0%
10
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
13
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
16
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
21
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
23
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
25
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
26
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
27
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%