The safety and relative effectiveness of non-psychoactive cannabinoid formulations for the improvement of sleep: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
Saleska, J.; Bryant, C.; Kolobaric, A.; Chen, J.; Loewy, D.; Colwell, C.; Pauli, E. K.
Show abstract
The objective of this randomized, double-blinded controlled trial was to evaluate the safety and relative effects of different formulations containing Cannabidiol (CBD) and melatonin, with and without the addition of minor cannabinoids, on sleep. Participants (N=1,793 adults experiencing symptoms of sleep disturbance) were assigned to receive a 4-week supply of 1 of 6 products (all capsules) containing either 15mg CBD or 5mg melatonin, alone or in combination with minor cannabinoids. Sleep disturbance was assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance SF 8A, administered via weekly online surveys. All formulations exhibited a favorable safety profile (12% of participants reported a side effect and none were severe) and led to significant improvements in sleep disturbance (p<0.001 in within-group comparisons). Most participants (56% to 75%) across all formulations experienced a clinically important improvement in their sleep quality. There were no significant differences in effect, however, between 15mg CBD isolate and formulations containing 15mg CBD and 15mg Cannabinol (CBN), alone or in combination with 5 mg Cannabichromene (CBC). There were also no significant differences in effect between 15mg CBD isolate and formulations containing 5 mg melatonin, alone or in combination with 15mg CBD and 15mg CBN. Our findings suggest that chronic use of a low dose of CBD is safe and could improve sleep quality, though these effects do not exceed that of 5 mg melatonin. Moreover, the addition of low doses of CBN and CBC may not improve the effect of formulations containing CBD or melatonin isolate.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk assessment of drug-induced Long QT Syndrome for some COVID-19 repurposed drugs 89%
- Savor the flavor — a randomized double-blind study on taste-enhanced placebo analgesia in healthy volunteers 88%
- A randomized, controlled, feasibility study of RD-X19 in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- A clinical trial to evaluate the dayzz smartphone app on employee sleep, health, and productivity at a large US employer 94%
- A large Australian longitudinal cohort registry demonstrates sustained safety and efficacy of oral medicinal cannabis for at least two years 93%
- Home-EEG assessment of possible compensatory mechanisms for sleep disruption in highly irregular shift workers - The ANCHOR study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sleep improvement for metabolic health: A feasibility trial of a digital sleep treatment in people with insomnia and non-diabetic hyperglycaemia. 95%
- Improving sleep after stroke: a randomised controlled trial of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia 93%
- Concentration-effect relationships of plasma caffeine on EEG delta power and cardiac autonomic activity during human sleep 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Poor sleep quality, insomnia, and short sleep duration before infection predict long-term symptoms after COVID-19 93%
- Differential effects of postpartum sleep restriction on maternal and offspring immunity in the rat 91%
- Probiotic bacteria and bile acid profile are modulated by prebiotic diet and associate with facilitated diurnal clock/sleep realignment after chronic disruption of rhythms 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seizure likelihood varies with day-to-day variations in sleep duration in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: A longitudinal EEG investigation 90%
- Early treatment with nitazoxanide prevents worsening of mild and moderate COVID-19 and subsequent hospitalization 89%
- An Interpretable Machine Learning Tool for In-Home Screening of Agitation Episodes in People Living with Dementia 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.