Biologic DMARD Access and Medication Cost-related Nonadherence in Rheumatology Patients in Canada: A Cross-sectional Survey
Holbrook, A. M.; Ding, A.; Troyan, S.; Costa, S.; Matsos, M.; Law, M.; Gong, S.; Dixit, A.; Foster, G.; Khalidi, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundCost-related nonadherence to prescription medications affects many Canadians and is associated with negative self-perceptions of health. Biologic disease modifying anti-arthritic drugs (bDMARDs) are costly drugs recommended for certain patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. We investigated access and cost-related nonadherence (CRN) to bDMARDs compared to other therapies for such patients in Ontario. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey of adult patients recruited from two academic rheumatology practices in Hamilton, Ontario, asking demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, drug plan coverage, medication cost-related cutbacks, opinions on the value of bDMARDs, and assistance with costs from health professionals. CRN was defined by patient self-report of not using or using less than prescribed amount of medication, due to cost. Results104 patients (mean age (SD) 61(12) years) participated, including 77 (74%) women, 57 (54.8%) taking bDMARDs, and 27 (25.9%) with household income <$40,000 annually. CRN was reported by 19 (18.3%) participants with no significant difference between those taking versus not taking bDMARDs (risk difference (95% CI): -0.10 (-0.25, 0.04); p=0.19). 37 (64.9%) of those taking bDMARDs reported that they would not take them if they had to pay the full cost. Overall, few patients reported that they would ask their doctor (17.3%) or pharmacist (15.4%) for help with reducing prescription costs. ConclusionCRN prevalence was relatively high amongst these rheumatology patients despite access to public and private funding mechanisms. Patients expressed a reluctance to ask their doctor or pharmacist for help in reducing their medication costs.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Refractory Inflammatory Arthritis definition and model generated through patient and multi-disciplinary professional modified Delphi process 92%
- UK osteopathic practice in 2019: a retrospective analysis of practice data 91%
- Imbalanced Machine Learning Classification Models For Removal Biosimilar Drugs And Increased Activity In Patients With Rheumatic Diseases 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Management of rheumatic diseases in the times of COVID-19 pandemic- perspectives of rheumatology practitioners from India 90%
- Risk factors for hospital admission related to COVID-19 in inflammatory rheumatic diseases 89%
- Clinical Outcomes of Patients with COVID-19 and Chronic Inflammatory and Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Multicentric Matched-Cohort Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 88%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 87%
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- The self-management support needs of people newly diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis: a realist review protocol 92%
- Factors influencing the outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions for managing fatigue across the lifespan of people living with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions: a scoping review protocol 90%
- Associations of joint swelling, joint stiffness, and joint pain with physical activity in first-degree relatives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back 88%
- Optimizing hospital opioid deprescribing: a multi-level consensus study bridging evidence, expertise, and patient perspectives 88%
- Effect of corticosteroid treatment on 1376 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A cohort study. 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.