Back

Biologic DMARD Access and Medication Cost-related Nonadherence in Rheumatology Patients in Canada: A Cross-sectional Survey

Holbrook, A. M.; Ding, A.; Troyan, S.; Costa, S.; Matsos, M.; Law, M.; Gong, S.; Dixit, A.; Foster, G.; Khalidi, N.

2023-01-20 health policy
10.1101/2023.01.20.23284839 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCost-related nonadherence to prescription medications affects many Canadians and is associated with negative self-perceptions of health. Biologic disease modifying anti-arthritic drugs (bDMARDs) are costly drugs recommended for certain patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. We investigated access and cost-related nonadherence (CRN) to bDMARDs compared to other therapies for such patients in Ontario. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey of adult patients recruited from two academic rheumatology practices in Hamilton, Ontario, asking demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, drug plan coverage, medication cost-related cutbacks, opinions on the value of bDMARDs, and assistance with costs from health professionals. CRN was defined by patient self-report of not using or using less than prescribed amount of medication, due to cost. Results104 patients (mean age (SD) 61(12) years) participated, including 77 (74%) women, 57 (54.8%) taking bDMARDs, and 27 (25.9%) with household income <$40,000 annually. CRN was reported by 19 (18.3%) participants with no significant difference between those taking versus not taking bDMARDs (risk difference (95% CI): -0.10 (-0.25, 0.04); p=0.19). 37 (64.9%) of those taking bDMARDs reported that they would not take them if they had to pay the full cost. Overall, few patients reported that they would ask their doctor (17.3%) or pharmacist (15.4%) for help with reducing prescription costs. ConclusionCRN prevalence was relatively high amongst these rheumatology patients despite access to public and private funding mechanisms. Patients expressed a reluctance to ask their doctor or pharmacist for help in reducing their medication costs.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.