Accuracy of direct genomic values and methylation profile through genotype-by-LowPass sequencing using Nanopore technology
Gonzalez-Recio, O.; Lopez-Catalina, A.; Peiro-Pastor, R.; Nieto-Valle, A.; Castro, M.; Fernandez, A.
Show abstract
Genotype-by-sequencing has been proposed as an alternative to SNP genotyping arrays in genomic selection to obtain a high density of markers along the genome. It requires a low sequencing depth to be cost effective, which may increase the error at the genotype assigment. Third generation Nanopore sequencing technology offers low cost sequencing and the possibility to detect genome methylation, which provides added value to genotype-by-sequencing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of genotype-by-LowPass Nanopore sequencing for estimating the direct genomic value in dairy cattle, and the possibility to obtain methylation marks simultaneously. Latest Nanopore chemistry (LSK14 and Q20) achieved a modal base calling accuracy of 99.55 %, whereas previous kit (LSK109) achieved slightly lower accuracy (99.1 %). The direct genomic value accuracy from genotype-by-Low Pass sequencing ranged between 0.79 and 0.99, depending on the trait, with a sequencing depth as low as 2x and using the latest chemistry (LSK114). Lower sequencing depth led to biased estimates, yet with high rank correlations. The LSK109 and Q20 achieved lower accuracies (0.57-0.93). More than one million high reliable methylated sites were obtained, even at low sequencing depth, located mainly in distal intergenic (87 %) and promoter (5 %) regions. This study showed that the latest Nanopore technology can be use in a LowPass sequencing framework to estimate direct genomic values with high reliability. It may provided advantages in populations with no available SNP chip, or when a large density of markers with a wide range of allele frequencies is needed. In addition, Low Pass sequencing provided with nucleotide methylation status of >1 million nucleotides at [≥] 10x, which is an added value for epigenetic studies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fine-Tuning GBS Data with Comparison of Reference and Mock Genome Approaches for Advancing Genomic Selection in Less Studied Farmed Species 95%
- Flexible, Production-Scale, Human Whole Genome Sequencing On A Benchtop Sequencer 93%
- DNA methylation-based sex classifier to predict sex and identify sex chromosome aneuploidy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimised multiplex amplicon sequencing for mutation identification using the MinION nanopore sequencer 94%
- Patterns of DNA variation between the autosomes, the X chromosome and the Y chromosome in Bos taurus genome 93%
- System Analysis Of The Sequencing Quality Of Human Whole Exome Samples On Bgi Ngs Platform 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a combined species SNP array for the European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) 92%
- Characterization of interindividual DNA methylation variability in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) 91%
- Minimum Error Calibration and Normalization for Genomic Copy Number Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optical genome mapping as a next-generation cytogenomic tool for detection of structural and copy number variations for prenatal genomic analyses 93%
- The FORCE panel: An all-in-one SNP marker set for confirming investigative genetic genealogy leads and for general forensic applications 93%
- Estimates of autozygosity through runs of homozygosity in farmed coho salmon 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.