Military sexual trauma-related posttraumatic stress disorder service-connection award denial across gender and race
Webermann, A. R.; Gianoli, M. O.; Rosen, M. I.; Portnoy, G. A.; Haskell, S. G.; Runels, T.; Black, A. C.
Show abstract
The current study characterizes a cohort of veteran claims filed with the Veterans Benefits Administration for posttraumatic stress disorder secondary to experiencing military sexual trauma, compares posttraumatic stress disorder service-connection award denial for military sexual trauma-related claims versus combat-related claims, and examines military sexual trauma -related award denial across gender and race. We conducted analyses on a retrospective national cohort of veteran claims submitted and rated between October 2017-May 2022, including 102,404 combat-related claims and 31,803 military sexual trauma-related claims. Descriptive statistics were calculated, logistic regressions assessed denial of service-connection across stressor type and demographics, and odds ratios were calculated as effect sizes. Military sexual trauma-related claims were submitted primarily by White women Army veterans, and had a two times higher odds of being denied (27.6%) than combat claims (18.2%). When controlling for demographics including age, race, and gender, men veterans had a 1.77 times higher odds of having military sexual trauma-related claims denied compared to women veterans (36.6% vs. 25.4%), and Black veterans had a 1.39 times higher odds of having military sexual trauma-related claims denied compared to White veterans (32.4% vs. 25.3%). Three-fourths of military sexual trauma-related claims were awarded in this cohort, however, there were disparities in awarding of claims across gender and race for men and Black veterans, which suggest the possibility of systemic barriers for veterans from underserved backgrounds and/or who may underreport military sexual trauma.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Body image and appearance distress among military veterans and civilians with an injury-related visible difference: A comparison study 95%
- Moderators of Treatment Outcomes for LGBTQ+ Military Veterans in the PRIDE in All Who Served Health Promotion Group 95%
- Protocol for the Houston Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 93%
- Differences in COVID-19 Risk by Race and County-Level Social Determinants of Health Among Veterans 91%
- Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with self-reported health among New Zealand military Veterans: a cross-sectional study 94%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 92%
- Cost effectiveness of interventions for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders following major incidents including terrorism and pandemics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Piloting Forensic Tele-Mental Health Evaluations of Asylum Seekers 89%
- Absence of nonfatal suicidal behavior preceding suicide death reveals differences in clinical risks 89%
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.