Differential COVID-19 mortality in the United States: Patterns, causes and policy implications
A Stoto, M. A.; Schlageter, S.; Gamannossi deglInnocenti, D.; Zollo, F.; Kraemer, J.
Show abstract
A "two Americas" narrative emerged in the summer of 2021: one with high demand for COVID-19 vaccines, and a second with widespread vaccine hesitancy and opposition to mask mandates. But our analysis of excess mortality shows that the U.S. has been a divided nation at least since the start of the pandemic. Through April, 2022, there were 1,335,292 excess deaths associated with COVID-19, 37% more than reported as such. After the first wave, death rates in the South were more than double those in the Northeast; 45% of deaths were in the South, with 38% of the population. While some regard vaccination and other measures as matters of personal choice, the population impact is striking. If every region had the same mortality rate as the lowest regional rate in each period, more than 418,763 COVID-19 deaths were "avoidable," more than half (58%) in the South and almost half before vaccines were available. These results show that population-based COVID-19 policies can still play an important role in protecting those most vulnerable to severe disease and death and reducing the spread of the virus. This example illustrates the importance of excess mortality measures as part of a comprehensive surveillance system. Official mortality counts rely on complete recording of COVID-19 as a cause of death, but COVID-19 deaths are under reported for many reasons. Indeed, the proportion of COVID-19 deaths reported as such varied markedly over time, and from 67% in the West to 87% the Northeast. In 2022, some regions cut back on testing making it harder to see a re-emergence of COVID-19 in those places. More extensive surveillance based on wastewater testing and other means that do not depend on testing are needed to get a more accurate picture. Excess mortality estimates are more tenuous years beyond the pre-pandemic period.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reductions in US life expectancy from COVID-19 by Race and Ethnicity: Is 2021 a repetition of 2020? 95%
- COVID-19 mortality in the United States: It’s been two Americas from the start 95%
- Analysis of Accumulated SARS-CoV-2 Seroconversion in North Carolina: The COVID-19 Community Research Partnership 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing COVID-19 vaccination strategies in varied demographics using an individual-based model 91%
- Stay-at-home and face mask policies intentions inconsistent with incidence and fatality during US COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Projecting the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on the COVID-19 epidemic and social restoration in the United States: a mathematical modelling study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adjusting COVID-19 seroprevalence survey results to account for test sensitivity and specificity 94%
- Risk of COVID-19 Reinfection and Vaccine Breakthrough Infection, Madera County, California, 2021 93%
- Missing data and missed infections: Investigating racial and ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 testing and infection rates in Holyoke, Massachusetts 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial/ethnic disparities in exposure to COVID-19, susceptibility to COVID-19 and access to health care – findings from a U.S. national cohort 92%
- Epidemiology of the early COVID-19 epidemic in Orange County, California: comparison of predictors of test positivity, mortality, and seropositivity 92%
- Self-reported and physiological reactions to the third BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 (booster) vaccine dose 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Observed COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate Among the U.S. Population 93%
- Geographic disparities in COVID-19 case rates are not reflected in seropositivity rates using a neighborhood survey in Chicago 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential and rural-urban disease burden disparities across Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi, March 2020 — May 2021 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.