Immunogenicity and safety of Biological Es CORBEVAX vaccine as a heterologous booster dose in adult volunteers previously vaccinated with two doses of either COVISHIELD or COVAXIN: A Prospective double-blind randomised phase III clinical study
Thuluva, S.; Paradkar, V.; Gunneri, S.; Yerroju, V.; Mogulla, R. R.; Venkata Suneetha, P.; Turaga, K.; Binayke, A.; Zaheer, A.; Awasti, A.; Virkar, R.; Narang, M.; Nanjappa, P.; Mahantshetti, N.; Garg, B.; Mandal, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundVaccines developed against Covid-19 infection were effective in controlling symptomatic infections and hospitalizations. However, waning immunity was reported within 6 months of primary vaccination series. Due to waning of SARS-CoV-2 specific primary immunity, protection towards emerging variants of concern (VoC) was low. To rejuvenate the immunogenicity of vaccines, a third or booster dose was highly recommended by many state governments. In this regard, several clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the homologous or heterologous booster dose effectiveness against VoCs and showed that heterologous immune boosting more effective in controlling breakthrough infections. In this study, we studied the safety and immunogenicity of Biological-Es CORBEVAX vaccine in adult population as a heterologous booster dose. MethodsThis is a prospective phase-3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study evaluating safety, reactogenicity, tolerability and immunogenicity of CORBEVAX vaccine as a heterologous booster dose administered to adult volunteers previously vaccinated with two doses of either COVISHIELD or COVAXIN at least 6 months ago. Subjects were RT-PCR negative to SARS-CoV-2 prior to enrolment. A total of 416 subjects between 18 to 80 years of age, were enrolled in to one of the two treatment (COVISHIELD or COVAXIN primed subjects) groups (n=208/group) for safety and immunogenicity assessment. Within each group (n=208), subjects were randomized to receive CORBEVAX vaccine or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. FindingsThe safety profile of CORBEVAX vaccine administered as booster dose is comparable to the placebo-control group. All the reported adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in their intensity. There was no grade 3 or serious or AEs of special interest (AESI) reported during the study period and all the reported AEs resolved without any sequelae. CORBEVAX booster dose administration resulted in significant increase in humoral immune response (nAb titers and Anti-RBD IgG concentration) that was much superior to the placebo in both COVISHIELD and COVAXIN recipient arms. Significant increase in nAb titers against Omicron VOC as well as cellular immune response was also observed post CORBEVAX booster dose administration. InterpretationsEnhancement of immune response coupled with excellent safety profile of the CORBEVAX booster dose demonstrates significant benefit of giving CORBEVAX heterologous booster dose to subjects that have received COVISHIELD or COVAXIN primary vaccination; as early as 6 months post second dose of primary vaccination. The study was prospectively registered with clinical trial registry of India-CTRI/2022/01/039366
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Biological E’s CORBEVAX™ vaccine in children and adolescents: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo controlled, Phase-2/3 Study 99%
- Immunogenicity and Safety of a 14-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PNEUBEVAX 14TM) administered to 6-8 weeks old healthy Indian Infants: A single blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase-III study 98%
- A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and adverse events of priming with inactivated whole SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) followed by boosting the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster of protein subunit vaccine MVC-COV1901 after two doses of adenoviral vector vaccine AZD1222 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster with an RBD virus-like particle vaccine following two- or three-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SCB-2019, an adjuvanted, recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S-protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine in healthy 12–17 year-old adolescents 97%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 97%
- Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia 97%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine for COVID-19 after a primary regimen with BBIBP-CorV or BNT162b2 vaccines in Lima, Peru 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the UK, Europe, and the US and of the literature 94%
- Safety and effectiveness of dose-sparing strategies for seasonal influenza vaccine: a rapid scoping review of fractional dosing of the intramuscular influenza vaccine 94%
- COVID-19 vaccines and evidence-based medicine 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.