Diffusion Weighted MRI could precisely predict the pTERT mutation status of GBM using a residual convolutional neural network
hu, c.; fang, k.; zhang, J.; Bai, R.; wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundTelomerase reverse transcriptase promoter (pTERT) mutation status plays a key role in the decision-making and prognosis prediction of glioblastoma (GBM). The purpose of this study was to assess the prediction value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the pTERT mutation status of GBM MethodsMR imaging data and molecular information of 266 patients with GBM were obtained from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (n=266). We trained the same residual convolutional neural network (ResNet) for each MR modality, including structural MRIs (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, contrast enhanced T1-weighted) and DWI and its associated ADC map, and their combinations to compare the predictive capacities between DWI and conventional structural MRI. Moreover, we explored the effect of different Region of interests (ROIs) on the outcome of pTERT mutation status prediction: entire tumor (solid tumor, edema and cystic regions), tumor core (solid tumor), and enhanced tumor. ResultsStructural MRI modalities and their combination performed poorly in predicting the pTERT mutation status (accuracy, 51-54%, AUC, 0.545-0.571), while DWI in combination with its ADC maps yielded the best predictive performance (accuracy = 85.2%, AUC= 0.934). The further including of radiological and clinical characteristics could not further improve the predictive performance of pTERT mutation status. Among the three ROI selections, the entire tumor volume yielded the best prediction performance. ConclusionDWI and its associated ADC maps shows promising prediction value in the pTERT mutation in GBM and are suggested to be included into the MRI protocol of GBM in clinical practice. Key PointsO_LIThe ResNet model constructed by radiomics provided great help for the prediction of pTERT mutation in glioblastoma. C_LIO_LIIn the ResNet prediction model, conventional structural MRI was of little value while DWI and its associated ADC maps shows excellent value. C_LIO_LIThe model using the whole tumor as ROI showed best predictive capacity and potentiality for future clinical application. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 96%
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning 96%
- A Novel Fully Automated MRI-Based Deep Learning Method For Classification Of 1p/19q Co-Deletion Status In Brain Gliomas 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Graph-based Spatial Features with Overall Survival Status of Glioblastoma Patients 97%
- Predicting Prognosis and IDH Mutation Status for Patients with Lower-Grade Gliomas Using Whole Slide Images 94%
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity: utilizing radiomics model in clinical translation 94%
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 92%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- End-to-End Machine Learning based Discrimination of Neoplastic and Non-neoplastic Intracerebral Hemorrhage on Computed Tomography 93%
- Genome-wide identification and prediction of SARS-CoV-2 mutations show an abundance of variants: Integrated study of bioinformatics and deep neural learning. 90%
- Finding Consensus miRNAs Silencing KLF1 Expression as A Promising Therapeutic Option of Sickle Cell Anemia 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.