Calculation and meaning of "excess mortality": A comparison of Covid- and pre-Covid mortality data in 31 Eurostat countries from 1965 to 2021.
Gill, B.; Kehler, T.; Schneider, M.
Show abstract
0)Determining "excess mortality" makes it possible to compare the burden of disasters between countries and over time, and thus also to evaluate the success of mitigation measures. However, the debate on Covid-19 has exposed that calculations of excess mortalities vary considerably depending on the method and its specification. Moreover, it is often unclear what exactly is meant by "excess mortality". We define excess mortality as the excess over the number of deaths that would have been expected counter-factually, i.e. without the catastrophic event in question. That is, we include all normally occurring flu and heat waves, which are excluded by some authors with the consequence that they almost always record low expected values and correspondingly high excess mortality rates. Based on this definition, we use a very parsimonious calculation method that is easy to understand even for laypersons, namely the linear extrapolation of death figures from previous years to determine the excess mortality during the Covid-19 pandemic. But unlike other literature on this topic, we first evaluated and optimised the specification of our method using a larger historical data set in order to identify and minimise estimation errors and biases. The result shows that the excess mortality rates continuously published by international statistical offices - OECD and Eurostat - are often inflated and would have exhibited considerable excess mortalities in many countries and periods before Covid-19, if this value had already been of public interest at that time. It also reveals that mortality rates already fluctuated strongly in the past and that in a third of the countries studied, individual values from the past exceed the current fluctuations due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Three conclusions can be drawn from this study and its findings: 1) All calculation methods for current figures should first be evaluated against past figures. 2) The definition of excess mortality used should be made explicit. 3) Statistical offices should provide more realistic estimates. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=121 SRC="FIGDIR/small/22283850v1_fig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bf19aborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12e2c7forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6b6954org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d0382c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2:C_FLOATNO Average annual excess mortality in the two-year period 2020 to 2021, i.e. during the Covid-19 pandemic. We compare our proposed method (5-year trend) with the estimates of the OECD statistical office (5-year mean). C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Covid-19 and excess mortality rates not comparable across countries 96%
- Excess respiratory, circulatory, neoplasm and other mortality rates during the Covid-19 pandemic in the EU and their implications 95%
- Analysis of the early Covid-19 epidemic curve in Germany by regression models with change points 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Role of Societal Aspects in the Formation of Official COVID-19 Reports: A Data-Driven Analysis 92%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 92%
- A two-phase stochastic dynamic model for COVID-19 mid-term policy recommendations in Greece: a pathway towards mass vaccination 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.