Back

Cardiorespiratory fitness interventions for individuals with lower limb amputation: a scoping review.

van Kammen, K.; Seves, B.; Vrieling, A. H.; Dekker, R.; van Dijk, A.; Dijkstra, P. U.; Geertzen, J. H.

2022-12-22 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2022.12.22.22283838 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThis scoping review aimed to provide an overview of different cardiorespiratory training methods and their effects on cardiorespiratory fitness in persons with a lower limb amputation (LLA). MethodsStudies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The search strategy comprised four search strings with terms related to amputation or limb loss, lower extremity, training or exercise, and endurance or aerobic. Studies were included if they reported on persons with a LLA who followed a cardiorespiratory training. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used for quality assessment. ResultsNine studies (88 participants) were included, with weak (7 studies) to moderate (2 studies) quality. Duration of the programmes ranged from 1.5 to 26 weeks, with a frequency of 3-5 sessions per week. The intensity of the workload increased during the programmes in two studies. After training, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) had increased in all studies, in three studies significantly. The training effects were inconclusive for resting heart rate, peak heart rate, and blood pressure ConclusionsCardiorespiratory training methods - with tailored duration and intensity - tended to increase VO2max and are feasible in persons with a LLA but quality of the studies was weak. Implications for rehabilitationO_LIVO2max of persons with a lower limb amputation can improve after cardiorespiratory training. C_LIO_LITraining methods to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in persons with a lower limb amputation, in which training intensity is tailored to the patient (based on heart rate) are feasible. C_LIO_LIDue to the low methodological quality of the included studies, this scoping review cannot provide an evidence-based overview of training methods to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in persons with a lower limb amputation. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.