Adherence to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis intervention by transgender women: A systematic review
Moncayo-Quevedo, J. E.; Perez-Arizabaleta, M. D. M.; Villegas-Trujillo, L. M.; Rodriguez-Ortiz, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe prevalence of HIV is higher in the transgender population. Recently, the preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) intervention has been proven successful in reducing HIV acquisition in trials among men who have sex with men (MSM), and heterosexual couples. This research aims to investigate the adherence to PrEP by HIV-negative transgender women (TW). MethodsWere followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA Statement. Research in WoS, Ovid, Scopus, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases for studies that involved HIV-negative TW population and focused on their adherence to PrEP intervention and condom use after the treatment. Results11 studies were included. TW sample sizes were low in comparison to the total sample, which often included men who have sex with men (MSM) population. The participation and adherence to the intervention was low compared to MSM, and it was measured mainly by self-report (72.7%) or by Tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP)/ Emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP) dried blood spot (DBS) (45.5%). ConclusionsIt is important to increase awareness and explain the effect of PrEP on feminizing hormone therapy at the beginning of the trials. Nevertheless, the low adherence may be affected by the interaction between drugs and the barriers faced to use the health services.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sexual dysfunction among Nigerian women living with HIV infection 95%
- Sexual and Reproductive Health Needs of Women with Severe Mental Illness in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review 94%
- Childhood conditions, pathways to entertainment work and current practices of female entertainment workers in Cambodia Baseline findings from the Mobile Link trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circumcision for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men: an updated meta-analysis 96%
- Interest in and preference for long-acting injectable PrEP among men who have sex with men, trans* individuals, and cis-gender heterosexual women: a global systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Changes in sexual behavior, PrEP adherence, and access to sexual health services due to the COVID-19 pandemic among a cohort of PrEP-using MSM in the South 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I had made the decision, and no one was going to stop me” —Facilitators of PrEP adherence during pregnancy and postpartum in Cape Town, South Africa 94%
- Maternal PrEP use in HIV-uninfected pregnant women in South Africa: Role of Stigma in PrEP initiation, retention and adherence 94%
- Increasing HIV Testing Among Sexual and Gender Expansive Men in Kazakhstan: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial of a Community-Level Intervention 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Positive deviance for promoting dual-method contraceptive use among women in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial 95%
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 94%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Belgium: awareness, use, and antimicrobial resistance concerns in a cross-sectional online survey 94%
- How did COVID-19 measures impact sexual behaviour and access to HIV/STI services in Panama? Results from a national cross-sectional online survey 93%
- Characterizing HIV and STIs among Transgender Female Sex Workers: A Longitudinal Analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.