Back

Temporal DCE Profile of Brain Metastasis with A Comparison of Pseudoprogression Cases

Turk, S.; Kurokawa, R.; Naganawa, S.; Wallace, J.; Ma, T.; Johnson, T.; Moritani, T.; Kim, J.

2022-12-20 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2022.12.19.22283618 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo demonstrate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) perfusion changes in brain metastasis patients after chemoradiation therapy within the treatment responders (true-response group and pseudoprogression group) and between the true-response and pseudoprogression groups. Materials and Methods38 true-response patients with 38 brain metastases (13 melanoma, 11 lung, 7 breast, 7 others) with 3 consecutive DCE-MRI examinations (pretreatment, first follow-up and second follow-up) and 7 pseudoprogression patients with 10 melanoma metastases with 2 consecutive DCE-MRI examinations (pretreatment, first follow-up) were evaluated. DCE-MRI parameters and permeability graphs increase (rapid, slow, medium) and course pattern (washout, plateau, persistent) were analyzed and compared between the timing of the examinations and between the true-response and pseudoprogression groups, using paired t-tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests as appropriate. Automatic assessment of washout curves by Olea Brain Software was reviewed. ResultsPretreatment mean wash-in (15.3{+/-}24.7 vs 6.50{+/-}14.2, P<0.02), Vp (0.13{+/-}0.17 vs 0.06{+/-}0.06, P<0.01), Ktrans (0.37{+/-}0.48 vs 0.16{+/-}0.18, P<0.01), peak enhancement (123{+/-}98 vs 76{+/-}60.5, P<0.01), AUC (14x104{+/-}18x104 vs 5x104{+/-}10x104, P<0.001) values were significantly higher than that of post-treatment. Other DCE metrics and permeability graph factors between pre-and post-treatment MRI were not significantly different. There was no statistically significant difference in any imaging factors in pre-or first post-treatment DCE-MRI examinations between the true-response and pseudoprogression groups. ConclusionWash-in, Vp, Ktrans, peak enhancement, AUC values in DCE perfusion were significantly decreased after chemoradiation therapy in the responders. No statistically significant difference was shown between the true-response and pseudoprogression groups on either pre-or post-treatment, indicating the homogeneous permeability profiles in the responders.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.