Back

Multisite evaluation and validation of Optical Genome Mapping for prenatal genetic testing

Stevenson, R. E.; Liu, J.; Iqbal, A.; DuPont, B.; Sahajpal, N.; Ho, M.; Yu, J.; Brody, S. J.; Ganapathi, M.; Rajkovic, A.; Smolarek, T.; Boyar, F. Z.; Bui, P. H.; Dubuc, A. M.; Kolhe, R.; Levy, B.

2022-12-20 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.12.19.22283552 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cytogenetic studies represent a critical component of prenatal genetic testing. Prenatal diagnostic testing of amniotic fluid, chorionic villus sampling, or more rarely, fetal cord blood, is recommended following a positive or unreportable NIPT, maternal serum screen, abnormal ultrasound or increased genetic risk based on family history. While chromosomal microarray is the recommended first-tier prenatal diagnostic test for the detection of sub-microscopic copy number variants, in practice, multiple assays are often assessed, in concert, to achieve a final diagnostic result. The use of multiple methodologies is costly, time consuming, and labor intensive. Optical genome mapping is an emerging technique with application for prenatal diagnosis because of its ability to detect and resolve, in a single assay, all classes of pathogenic cytogenetic aberrations detectable by karyotyping, FISH, and microarray. In an effort to characterize the potential of optical genome mapping as a novel alternative to conventional testing, a multi-site, multi-operator, multi-instrument clinical research study was conducted to demonstrate its analytic validity and clinical utility. In the first phase a total of 200 specimens representing 123 unique cases demonstrated 100% concordance with standard of care methods and 100% reproducibility between sites, operators, and instruments. Analysis and interpretation of cases with incidental findings of potential clinical significance also were performed.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
4
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
6
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
7
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
19
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%