Training the Next Generation of Physician-Scientists: A Cohort-Based Program for MD-only Residents & Fellows
Solvik, T. A.; Schnoes, A. M.; Nguyen, T. A.; Behrman, S.; Maksoud, E.; Goodwin, S. S.; Weiss, E. J.; Padmanabhan, A.; Cornfield, D. N.
Show abstract
ImportanceDespite the importance of clinician-scientists in propelling biomedical advances, the proportion of physicians engaged in both hypothesis-driven research and clinical care continues to decline. Recently, multiple institutions have developed programs that promote MD-only physicians pursuing careers in science, but few reports on the impact of these are available. ObjectiveTo assess if a cohort-based training program for MD-only physician-scientists that includes didactic and experiential curricula favorably informs participants scientific development. DesignThe Chan Zuckerberg Biohub (CZB) Physician-Scientist Fellowship Program (PSFP) conducted a study from July 2020 to August 2023. Participants24 inaugural program participants at UCSF and Stanford University (median postgraduate year at program start, 5.5; 17 clinical specialties represented; 10 [42%] identified as female; 7 [29%] identified as underrepresented in medicine). ExposuresThe CZB PSFP is a selective two-year career development program for MD-only physicians. Participants attended a two-week immersive training at the program outset, and subsequently, weekly curricular and scientific meetings throughout the program while conducting research. Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcome measurements included pre-, 1-month, and 12-month assessments of confidence in research skills, career skills, and self-identification as scientists. Program satisfaction and feedback related to program curriculum and community were collected at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months. ResultsAfter 12 months, 100% (N=16) reported satisfaction with the program and participants demonstrated increased confidence in research skills [median (IQR), 4.0 (2.5-5.0) pre-bootcamp to 5.5 (4.0-6.0) 12-mo], career skills significantly increased [median (IQR), 4.0 (4.0-5.0) pre-bootcamp to 5.5 (5.0-6.0) 12-mo], perceptions of belonging significantly increased [median (IQR), 4.0 (2.5-5.4) pre-bootcamp to 5.5 (5.1-7.0) 12-mo], and scientific identity significantly increased [median (IQR), 5.0 (4.0-5.5) pre-bootcamp to 6.0 (5.5-7.0) 12-mo]. Conclusion and RelevanceParticipants demonstrated significant gains in confidence in core research and career skills as well as personal identification as scientists, demonstrating the efficacy of a longitudinal curriculum, peer support, and community building in fostering development as an investigator. The highly portable nature of this strategy may facilitate ready adoption and implementation at other institutions.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Making the Match or Breaking it? Values, Perceptions, and Obstacles of Trainees Applying into Physician-Scientist Training Programs 95%
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 94%
- Evaluating the inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer-related content in graduate medical education: a national survey of program directors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 95%
- PREP-aring is worth it: Success of the Case Western Reserve University Post-baccalaureate Research Education Program and its Scholars 94%
- A Retrospective Case Study of Successful Translational Research: Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment, Experiences in Community Engagement 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- PROPEL: a scalable model for postbaccalaureate training to promote diversity in the biomedical workforce 96%
- Remote Learning Barriers and Opportunities for Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Learners in Career and Professional Skill Development: A Case Study 95%
- Scientific societies advancing STEM workforce diversity: Lessons and Outcomes from the Minorities Affairs Committee of the American Society for Cell Biology 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 94%
- Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States 93%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.