To snooze, schmooze, peruse, booze, or learn new views: a rejected Christmas Issue research study
Wallach, J. D.; Ross, J. S.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the frequency of snoozing, schmoozing, perusing, and boozing among attendees at an international conference. DesignSurvey and field study SettingThe 9th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication in Chicago, Illinois (the conference). Participants53 attendees (perhaps just enough to be scientific). Main outcome measuresSelf-reported conference behavior including frequency of falling asleep (snoozing), interacting with other attendees (schmoozing), and multi-tasking (perusing) during presentations, as well as drinking (boozing) at the conference. Results53 attendees completed the survey, which represents a 100% response rate among the attendees who decided to complete the survey. Most of the respondents reported that they preferred in-person conferences before (47/53, 89%) and since (43/53, 81%) the COVID-19 pandemic. 49 (49/53, 92%) reported that multi-day, in-person conferences are still a good use of time. Although 49 (49/53, 92%) reported learning something new (new views), nearly half (24/49, 49%) stated that they could have learned this information from a book or journal article, as opposed to traveling to a conference. Two respondents (2/51, 4%) admitted to snoozing and 43 (84%) to perusing (e.g., emailing, working, and using Twitter) during presentations on the first day of the conference (we suspect that all 5 respondents who claimed that their sleep schedule was "none of our business" also snoozed regularly). The rate of boozing (up to 3 alcoholic beverages) on the first night of the conference was alarming (39/52, 75%), with an additional 10% unable to recall the total number of drinks consumed. ConclusionsFormal, presentation-based conferences may no longer be needed, as attendees appear to be overly preoccupied with snoozing, schmoozing, perusing, and boozing. What is already known on this topic- Scientific conferences have functioned as both professional and social events, allowing attendees to learn about the newest research findings while they schmooze, and sometimes booze, with their colleagues. - Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the research community has grown increasingly accustomed to the benefits of attending conferences from behind their computers. - Little is known about the behaviors and preferences of attendees following the COVID-19 conference hiatus. What this study adds- Almost all respondents reported that multi-day, in-person conferences were still a good use of time and that they had learned something new (even though over half admitted that they could have learned this information from a book or journal article, as opposed to traveling to a conference) - Conference attendees rarely snoozed but frequently perused (email, work, and Twitter) during presentations; over three-quarters boozed on the first night of the conference. - Formal, presentation-based conferences may no longer be needed, as attendees appear to be overly preoccupied with snoozing, schmoozing, perusing, and boozing.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 93%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 93%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 93%
- Assessing ChatGPT’s Mastery of Bloom’s Taxonomy using psychosomatic medicine exam questions 92%
- Social networking service, patient-generated health data, and population health informatics: patterns and implications for using digital technologies to support mental health 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 93%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 92%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 92%
- The Acceptability of a Tobacco Dependency Treatment for NHS Staff in the North East of England: A Mixed-Methods Study 91%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.