Back

Lack of effectiveness of Bebtelovimab Monoclonal Antibody Among High-Risk Patients with SARS-Cov-2 Omicron During BA.2, BA.2.12.1 and BA.5 Subvariants Dominated Era

Sridhara, S.; Gungor, A. B.; Erol, H. K.; Al-Obaidi, M.; Zangeneh, T.; Bedrick, E.; Ariyamuthu, V.; Shetty, A.; Qannus, A. A.; Mendoza, K.; Murugapandian, S.; Gupta, G.; Tanriover, B.

2022-12-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.12.06.22283183 medRxiv
Show abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariants are expected to be resistant to Bebtelovimab (BEB) monoclonal antibody (MAb) and the real-world experience regarding its effectiveness is scarce. This retrospective cohort study reports a data analysis in Banner Healthcare System (a large not-for-profit organization) between 4/5/2022 and 8/1/2022 and included 19,778 Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) positive (by PCR or direct antigen testing) patients who were selected from Cerner-Electronic Health Record after the exclusions criteria were met. The study index date for cohort was determined as the date of BEB MAb administration or the date of the first positive COVID-19 testing. The cohort consist of COVID-19 infected patients who received BEB MAb (N=1,091) compared to propensity score (PS) matched control (N=1,091). The primary outcome was the incidence of 30-day all-cause hospitalization and/or mortality. All statistical analyses were conducted on the paired (matched) dataset. For the primary outcome, the event counts and percentages were reported. Ninety-five percent Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals for percentages were computed. The study cohorts were 1:1 propensity matched without replacement across 26 covariates using an optimal matching algorithm that minimizes the sum of absolute pairwise distance across the matched sample after fitting and using logistic regression as the distance function. The pairs were matched exactly on patient vaccination status, BMI group, age group and diabetes status. Compared to the PS matched control group (2.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7%, 3.7%), BEB MAb use (2.2%; 95% CI: 1.4%, 3.3%) did not significantly reduce the incidence of the primary outcome (p=0.67). In the subgroup analysis, we observed similar no-difference trends regarding the primary outcomes for the propensity rematched BEB MAb treated and untreated groups, stratified by patient vaccination status, age (<65 years or [&ge;]65), and immunocompromised status (patients with HIV/AIDS or solid organ transplants or malignancy including lymphoproliferative disorder). The number needed to treat (1/0.026-0.022) with BEB MAb was 250 to avoid one hospitalization and/or death over 30 days. The BEB MAb use lacked efficacy in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants (mainly BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.5) in the Banner Healthcare System in the Southwestern United States.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
4
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
6
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
9
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
13
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
15
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
18
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
26
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%