A novel plasma proteomic computational model for predicting therapeutic benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer
Christopoulos, P.; Harel, M.; Lahav, C.; Sela, I.; Dahan, N.; Reinmuth, N.; Koch, I.; Zer, A.; Moskovitz, M.; Levy-Barda, A.; Lotem, M.; Nechushtan, H.; Katzenelson, R.; Agbarya, A.; Abu-Amna, M.; Gottfried, M.; Tepper, E.; Ambrosone, C. B.; Wolf, I.; Lou, Y.; Leibowitz, R.; Dicker, A. P.; Carbone, D. P.; Gandara, D.
Show abstract
ImportanceAdvanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with no driver mutations are typically treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy, either in the form of monotherapy or concurrently with chemotherapy, while treatment modality selection is based mainly on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels in the tumor. However, PD-L1 assays are only moderately predictive of therapeutic benefit. ObjectiveTo develop a novel decision-making tool for physicians treating NSCLC patients on whether to administer immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Design, setting, and participantsThis multicenter observational study includes patients from an ongoing clinical trial (PROPHETIC; NCT04056247). Patients were recruited from 13 different centers (total n=425; 58 patients were excluded) from June 2016 and June 2021. Plasma samples were obtained prior to treatment initiation, and deep proteomic profiling was conducted. PROphet(R) computational model for predicting clinical benefit (CB) probability at 12 months was developed based on the plasma proteomic profile. The model performance was validated in a blinded manner. Following validation, training and prediction was performed over the entire cohort using cross-validation methodology. The patients were divided into four groups based on their PD-L1 expression level combined with their CB probability, and the survival outcome was examined for each group. The data were analyzed from July to October 2022. Main outcome and measuresClinical benefit from ICI-based treatment, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). ResultsThe model displayed strong predictive capability with an AUC of 0.78 (p-value = 5.00e-05), outperforming a PD-L1-based predictive model (AUC = 0.62; p-value 2.76e-01), and exhibited a significant difference in OS and PFS between patients with low and high CB probabilities. When combining CB probability with PD-L1 expression levels, four patient subgroups were identified; (i) patients with PD-L1[≥]50% and a negative PROphet result who significantly benefit from ICI-chemotherapy combination therapy compared to ICI monotherapy; (ii) patients with PD-L1[≥]50% and a positive PROphet result who benefit similarly from either treatment modalities; (iii) patients with PD-L1<50% and a negative PROphet result who do not benefit from either treatment modalities; (iv) patients with PD-L1<50% and a positive PROphet score who benefit from combination therapy. Conclusions and relevanceThe PROphet(R) model displayed good performance for prediction of CB at 12 months based on a plasma sample obtained prior to treatment. Our findings further demonstrate a potential clinical utility for informing treatment decisions for NSCLC patients treated with ICIs by adding resolution to the PD-L1 biomarker currently used to guide treatment selection, thereby enabling to select the most suitable treatment modality for each patient.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning for prediction of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer from simple clinical and biological data 94%
- Circulating Low Density Neutrophils Are Associated with Resistance to First-Line Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 93%
- KRAS mutations impact clinical outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Oncogene Mutations of Lung Cancer Using Deep Learning and Histopathologic Features on Whole-Slide Images 92%
- Enhancing Chemotherapy Response Prediction via Matched Colorectal Tumor-Organoid Gene Expression Analysis and Network-Based Biomarker Selection 92%
- A 'one-two punch' therapy strategy to target chemoresistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-World Benchmarking and Validation of Foundation Model Transformers for Endometrial Cancer Subtyping from Histopathology 93%
- Multi-omics analysis of serial samples from metastatic TNBC patients on PARP inhibitor monotherapy provide insight into rational PARP inhibitor therapy combinations 93%
- Overcoming Resistance to BRAFV600E Inhibition in Melanoma by Deciphering and Targeting Personalized Protein Network Alterations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic Insights Guiding Personalized First-Line Immunotherapy Response in Lung and Bladder Tumors 93%
- A Community Challenge to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 93%
- Panomics reveals patient-individuality as the major driver for colorectal cancer progression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- DAGM: a novel modelling framework to assess the risk of HER2-negative breast cancer based on germline rare coding mutations 92%
- Global and single-cell proteomics view of the co-evolution between neural progenitors and breast cancer cells in a co-culture model 91%
- Metabolomic profiling of pancreatic adenocarcinoma reveals fundamental clinical features 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.