Adverse events connected to breast cancer treatment and their associated decrease in quality of life scores.
Diernberger, K.; Gray, E.; Atter, M.; Bullen, A.; Hall, P. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed form of cancer in the UK, with over 55,000 newly diagnosed cases annually. Fortunately, many patients are cured, with a five-year survival rate of about 80%. Adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer is common and has been shown to increase survival but frequently comes with several adverse events. These can impact patients quality of life (QoL) and influence health care costs. Relatively little is known about the magnitude of effects on the QoL of specific toxicities and toxicity profiles. MethodsAdverse event and QoL data (using EQ-VAS and EQ5D) from sub-studies embedded in two different randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens were used in the analysis. Adverse events were grouped into 20 main toxicity categories. QoL data were reported at baseline and following phases of chemotherapy treatment. Correlations between toxicity groups were explored. Univariate and multivariate analyses investigated the association between individual adverse events and reported QoL. To predict the impact of specific adverse events, a regression model specification was developed based on data from one trial using a backwards selection procedure and assessed for validity using data from the other trial. ResultsThe most frequently reported toxicities in both trials were Alopecia, Lethargy-Depression-Anxiety, Nausea-Vomiting and Stomatitis. The univariate analysis showed a clear decrease in patients QoL measured through the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). Results based on EQ5D measurements did not show a clear direction of toxicities influence on patients QoL. Multivariate results demonstrated a significant change in QoL for Lethargy-Depression-Anxiety, Diarrhoea, Skin-disorders, Infection, Dyspnoea-Respiratory and specified pain. ConclusionsOnly a small part of the change in patients QoL is induced by the different adverse events the patients faced. Results based on VAS showed a much bigger influence of certain adverse events on patients QoL than those derived from EQ5D, leading to the question of whether EQ5Ds domains are capturing what is of importance to patients during chemotherapy treatment.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 93%
- Using numerical modelling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample 92%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Selumetinib in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory RAS-pathway mutated paediatric and adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (SeluDex): study protocol for an international, parallel-group, dose-finding with expansion phase I/II trial 93%
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 93%
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA expression classifiers from a model of breast epithelial cell organization to predict pathological complete response in triple negative breast cancer 90%
- Adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in young Japanese people: A case-control study of the risk of systemic adverse events by a questionnaire surveyShort title: COVID-19 vaccine adverse events in young Japanese 88%
- What is the value of community oximetry monitoring in people with SARS-CoV-2? – A prospective, open-label clinical study 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 94%
- ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer 94%
- Feasibility of Administering Human Pancreatic Cancer Chemotherapy in a Spontaneous Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.