Back

Testing for bi-directional rejection thresholds to sweetness and their links to sugar intake and sweet-taste drink consumption

Peng, M.; Ginieis, R.; Abeywickrema, S.; McCormack, J. C.; Prescott, J.

2022-11-28 nutrition
10.1101/2022.11.27.22282800 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsSugar intake has been linked to obesity, however, the relationship between individual sugar perception and dietary choice remains unclear. The current study aims to measure individual bi-directional rejection thresholds and compare these measures to sugar intake and consumption patterns of sweet-taste beverages. MethodsA cross-section design will be used to analyse the relationship between sweetness perception, sucrose liking, and dietary intake. Participants will attend laboratory sessions to assess sucrose liking, ascending and descending rejection thresholds, and detection thresholds, and complete a 4-day weighed food-diary to assess dietary intake. ANCOVA will be used to test for differences in detection threshold and hedonic VAS ratings between the liking and disliking group, with age, gender, and BMI as covariates. A generalised linear mixed-models will be applied to test for differences in individual ascending versus descending rejection threshold across the two sweet liker status groups. Regression models will be used to test the role of ascending versus descending rejection thresholds on predicting sugar and sweet-taste beverage consumption. DiscussionMore research focusing on links between individual sweetness perception and sugar intake will be important for elucidating the mechanism underpinning sensory effects on dietary behaviour.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
7
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Physiology & Behavior
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Food & Function
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.9%
19
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
Journal of Dairy Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%