Comparative effectiveness of heterologous booster schedules with AZD1222, BNT162b2, or mRNA-1273 vaccines against COVID-19 during omicron predominance in the Nordic countries
Andersson, N. W.; Thiesson, E. M.; Baum, U.; Pihlstrom, N.; Starrfelt, J.; Faksova, K.; Poukka, E.; Lund, L. C.; Hansen, C. H.; Aakjaer, M.; Andersen, M.; Kjaer, J.; Cohet, C.; Goossens, M.; Hallas, J.; Meijerink, H.; Rickard, L.; Hviid, A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of heterologous booster schedules with AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca, referred to as AZD), BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech, BNT), and mRNA-1273 (Moderna, MOD) vaccines compared with primary schedules and with homologous mRNA-vaccine booster schedules during a period of omicron predominance. DesignPopulation-based cohort analyses. SettingDenmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, 27 December 2020 to 28 February 2022. ParticipantsAdults that had received at least a primary vaccination schedule (ie, two doses) of the AZD, BNT, and/or MOD vaccines during the study period. Main outcome measuresUsing the Kaplan-Meier estimator, we compared country-specific risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes in heterologous booster vaccinated with primary schedule vaccinated (matched analyses) and homologous booster vaccinated (weighted analyses) since emergence of omicron. ResultsHeterologous booster schedules improved protection against all outcomes compared with primary schedules, with the largest and most robust effects observed for severe COVID-19. Risk differences for documented infection ranged from -22.4% to -3.1% (comparative vaccine effectiveness [CVE] 9.7% to 60.9%; >63.2% for COVID-19 hospitalisation) across countries for AZD1BNT2BNT3 (AZD as primary dose followed by two doses of BNT) vs AZD1BNT2 and -22.2% to -3.2% (CVE 37.4% to 67.8%; >34.6% for hospitalisation) for BNT1BNT2MOD3 vs BNT1BNT2, the two most common heterologous booster schedules. Heterologous- and homologous booster schedules had comparable effectiveness. Risk differences of documented infection ranged from -0.4% to 4.4% (CVE -20.0% to 2.4%) for AZD1BNT2BNT3 vs BNT1BNT2BNT3 and -19.8% to 1.7% (CVE -14.6% to 53.8%) for BNT1BNT2MOD3 vs BNT1BNT2BNT3; for most comparisons, risk differences for severe COVID-19 outcomes were smaller than 1 per 1000 vaccinated. Previous infection followed by a booster dose conferred the greatest protection. ConclusionHeterologous booster vaccine schedules are associated with an increased protection against omicron-related COVID-19 outcomes that is comparable to that afforded by homologous booster schedules.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Post-marketing active surveillance of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in persons aged 12-39 years in Italy: a multi-database, self-controlled case series study 95%
- Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine NVX-CoV2373 in Younger and Older Adults 94%
- Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boost immunization with an adenovirus type-5-vectored and protein-subunit-based COVID-19 vaccine (Convidecia/ZF2001): a randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 97%
- Real-world effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in South Korea 96%
- Comparative effectiveness of four COVID-19 vaccines, BNT162b2 mRNA, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCov-19 and NVX-CoV2373 against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) infection 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, July – November 2021 96%
- Effectiveness of inactivated and Ad5-nCoV COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA. 2 variant infection, severe illness, and death 95%
- Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, January – September 2021 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.