Two-dimensional maps to predict the neurological recovery after cardiac arrest
Floyrac, A.; Doumergue, A.; Legriel, S.; Deyec, N.; Richard, A.; Megarbane, B.; Meppiel, E.; Masmoudi, S.; Lozeron, P.; Vicaut, E.; kubis, n.; holcman, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundSeverity of neuronal damage in comatose patients following anoxic brain injury is assessed through a multimodal evaluation. However, predicting the return to full consciousness of hospitalized post-anoxic comatose patients remains challenging. MethodsWe present here a method to predict the return to consciousness and good neurological outcome based on the analysis of responses to auditory periodic stimulations to auditory evoked potentials. We extracted several EEG features from the time series responses in a window of few hundreds of milliseconds from the standard and deviant auditory stimulations that we considered independently. By combining these features, we built a two-dimensional map to evaluate possible group clustering. Using Gaussian, K-neighbourhood and SVM classifiers, we could predict the neurological outcome of post-anoxic comatose patients, the validity of the method being tested by a cross-validation procedure. This method was developed using data acquired retrospectively in a cohort of 29 post-cardiac arrest comatose patients, recorded between day 3 and day 6 following admission. Data from event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded non-invasively with four surface cranial electrodes at electro-encephalography (EEG), that we computed secondarily. ResultsAnalysis in two-dimensions of the present data revealed two separated clusters of patients with good versus bad neurological outcome. When favouring the highest specificity of our mathematical algorithms (0.91), we found a sensitivity of 0.83 and an accuracy of 0.90, maintained when calculation was performed using data from only one central electrode. To concludestatistics of standard and deviant responses considered separately provide complementary and confirmatory predictions of the outcome of anoxic comatose patients, better assessed when combining these features on a two-dimensional statistical map. The benefit of this method compared to classical EEG and ERP predictors should be tested in a large prospective cohort. If validated, this method could provide an alternative tool to intensivists, to better evaluate neurological outcome and improve patient management, without neurophysiologist assistance.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- EEG microstate dynamics indicate a U-shaped path to propofol-induced loss of consciousness 96%
- Burst c-VEP Based BCI: Optimizing Stimulus Design for Enhanced Classification with Minimal Calibration Data and Improved User Experience 95%
- Differentiation of speech-induced artifacts from physiological high gamma activity in intracranial recordings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sound perception in realistic surgery scenarios: Towards EEG-based auditory work strain measures for medical personnel. 93%
- Recurrent Neural Network-based Acute Concussion Classifier using Raw Resting State EEG Data 93%
- Dynamic network properties of the interictal brain determine whether seizures appear focal or generalised 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- autoMEA: Machine learning-based burst detection for multi-electrode array datasets 94%
- Response to photic stimulation as a measure of cortical excitability in epilepsy patients 93%
- Xenon LFP Analysis Platform is a Novel Graphical User Interface for Analysis of Local Field Potential from Large-Scale MEA Recordings 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reference values for amplitude-integrated EEGs in children from 1 month to 17 years of age 93%
- Seizure Forecasting Using a Novel Sub-Scalp Ultra-Long Term EEG Monitoring System 93%
- Towards individualized Medicine in Stroke – the TiMeS project: protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.