AI-based Prediction of Imminent Primary Stroke on Claims Data Enables Accurate Patient Stratification
Hilbert, A.; Baskan, D.; Rieger, J.; Wagner, C.; Sehlen, S.; Garcia-Rudolph, A.; Kelleher, J. D.; Dengler, N.; Kossen, T.; Madai, V. I.; Frey, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundWith an annual rate of 5.5 million cases, ischemic stroke is the second leading cause of death and permanent disability worldwide posing a significant medical, financial and social burden. Current approaches relax high-risk profiles of imminent stroke to mid- to long-term risk assessment, tempering the importance of immediate preventative action. Claims data may support the development of new risk prediction paradigms for better, individualized management of disease. MethodsWe developed a data-driven paradigm to predict personalized risk of imminent primary ischemic stroke. We used social health insurance data from northeast Germany (between 2008-2018). Stroke events were defined by the presence of an ischemic stroke ICD-10 diagnosis within the available insurance period. Controls (n=150,091) and strokes (n=53,047) were matched by age (mean=76) and insurance length (mean=3 years), resulting in a generally aged, high-risk study population. We trained traditional and Machine Learning (ML) classifiers to predict the overall likelihood of a primary event based on 55 features including demographic parameters, ICD-10 diagnosis of diseases and dependence on care. Binary ICD-10 features were translated into temporal duration of diagnoses by counting days since the first appearance of disease in the patients records. We used SHAP feature importance scores for global and local explanation of model output. FindingsThe best ML model, Tree-boosting, yielded notably high performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.91, sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.81. Long duration of hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes type 2 were most influential for predicting stroke while frequent dependence on care proved to mitigate stroke risk. InterpretationOur proposed data-driven ML approach provides a highly promising direction for improved and personalized prevention and management of imminent stroke, while the developed models offer direct applicability for risk stratification in the north-east German population. FundingHorizon2020 (PRECISE4Q, #777107)
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning-based Prediction of Early Cerebrovascular Events after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 95%
- Machine learning approach to dynamic risk modeling of mortality in COVID-19: a UK Biobank study 93%
- Developing And Validating COVID-19 Adverse Outcome Risk Prediction Models From A Bi-National European Cohort Of 5594 Patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning-based forecasting of daily acute ischemic stroke admissions using weather data 95%
- Cohort Design and Natural Language Processing to Reduce Bias in Electronic Health Records Research: The Community Care Cohort Project 92%
- Continuous-Time and Dynamic Suicide Attempt Risk Prediction with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced and Interpretable Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care 95%
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 93%
- Opening the Black Box of Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support: A Study Predicting Stroke Outcome 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 90%
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 90%
- Differences in estimates for ten-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Black versus white persons with identical risk factor profiles using pooled cohort equations 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing randomized trial designs to estimate treatment effect in rare diseases with longitudinal models: a simulation study showcased by Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxias using the SARA score 90%
- Assessing the transportability of clinical prediction models for cognitive impairment using causal models 90%
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.