A single-centre, observational study to evaluate immune response to Covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients with haematological disorders (COVAC-IC)
CHANDRA, D.; COAVC-IC INVESTIGATORS, ; O'Mara, L.; Bailey, L.; Aspey, M.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Banavathi, K.; Lea, S.; Bowler, R.; Prasangika, J.; Phillips, N.; Wasim, F.; Badugama, B.; Kamran, N.; Perera, K.; Bano, F.; Pillai, S.; Dyer, P.; Aquil, M.; Goddard, S.; Ogbolosingha, A.; Remegoso, A.; Lee, J.; Watts, K.; Karunanithi, K.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate immunological response to Covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised haematology patients and compare with immunocompetent healthy controls DesignWe compared total Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody and T cell response in 45 immunocompromised haematology patients with 30 healthy adults following 2 doses of Covid-19 vaccine for 3 -5 months at 30 day intervals SettingSingle Centre, University Hospital, United Kingdom, March 2021-December 2021 Main Outcome measuresPeak quantitative total spike-specific antibody and cellular responses ResultsWe found O_LINon - significant difference in T cell and total Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody response between study and control group patients C_LIO_LISix (13%) study group participants did not have detectable Total Anti-SARS -Cov-2 S antibodies at any time point throughout the study monitoring period. C_LIO_LIThree (7%) of the study group participants had no response, even after additional booster doses of Covid-19 vaccine. C_LIO_LIAll (100%) of the control group had detectable Anti-SARS-Cov-2 S antibodies after 2 doses of Covid-19 vaccine. C_LIO_LINo participant died or was hospitalised due to severe Covid-19 infection during the study period. This included study group participants who had no antibody response at any time point. C_LI ConclusionsThough there was a non - significant difference in T cell and total Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody response between immunocompromised patients and healthy controls this did not result in any severe infection or Covid-19 related mortality in our study cohort. We did not identify any patient-specific factor (age, gender), specific haematological condition or treatment as determinant of response. Covid-19 vaccination was well tolerated without major side effects in both groups. What was already known about this topicprior to starting this study there were no studies to confirm immunological response following Covid-19 vaccination in immunocompromised haematology patients. During the conduct of our study there have been publications from researchers confirming blunted serological response in 62-66% of immunocompromised haematology patients compared to 74-95% in healthy controls. What this study addsOur study did not identify a significant difference in serological or T cell response between immunocompromised and healthy groups. Though 13% of immunocompromised patients had no response to Covid-19 vaccination none of them suffered from severe Covid-19 infection. We believe T cell response to Covid-19 vaccination has an important role in providing protective efficacy against Covid-19.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and adverse events of priming with inactivated whole SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) followed by boosting the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine 94%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster of protein subunit vaccine MVC-COV1901 after two doses of adenoviral vector vaccine AZD1222 94%
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of GamEvac-Combi, a heterologous rVSV- and rAd5-vectored Ebola vaccine: a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial in the Republic of Guinea and Russia 93%
- Cellular and humoral immune response to a third dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine – a prospective observational study 93%
- Association of Naïve B Cells with Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune response to COVID-19 vaccination is attenuated by poor disease control and antimyeloma therapy with vaccine driven divergent T cell response 92%
- COVID symptoms, testing, shielding impact on patient reported outcomes and early vaccine responses in individuals with multiple myeloma 92%
- Low seropositivity and sub-optimal neutralisation rates in patients fully vaccinated against COVID-19 with B cell malignancies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical and laboratory features of COVID-19 illness and outcomes in immunocompromised individuals during the first pandemic wave in Sydney, Australia 93%
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 93%
- The impact of Gam-COVID-Vac, an AdV5/AdV26 COVID-19 vaccine, on the biomarkers of endothelial function, coagulation and platelet activation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody Response after Second-dose of ChAdOx1-nCOV (Covishield™ ® ) and BBV-152 (Covaxin™ ® ) among Health Care Workers in India: Final Results of Cross-sectional Coronavirus Vaccine-induced Antibody Titre (COVAT) study 94%
- Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Biological E’s CORBEVAX™ vaccine in children and adolescents: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo controlled, Phase-2/3 Study 94%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity after booster dose with AZD1222 via intradermal route among adult who had received CoronaVac 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.