Back

A single-centre, observational study to evaluate immune response to Covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients with haematological disorders (COVAC-IC)

CHANDRA, D.; COAVC-IC INVESTIGATORS, ; O'Mara, L.; Bailey, L.; Aspey, M.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Banavathi, K.; Lea, S.; Bowler, R.; Prasangika, J.; Phillips, N.; Wasim, F.; Badugama, B.; Kamran, N.; Perera, K.; Bano, F.; Pillai, S.; Dyer, P.; Aquil, M.; Goddard, S.; Ogbolosingha, A.; Remegoso, A.; Lee, J.; Watts, K.; Karunanithi, K.

2022-11-17 hematology
10.1101/2022.11.16.22282121 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate immunological response to Covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised haematology patients and compare with immunocompetent healthy controls DesignWe compared total Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody and T cell response in 45 immunocompromised haematology patients with 30 healthy adults following 2 doses of Covid-19 vaccine for 3 -5 months at 30 day intervals SettingSingle Centre, University Hospital, United Kingdom, March 2021-December 2021 Main Outcome measuresPeak quantitative total spike-specific antibody and cellular responses ResultsWe found O_LINon - significant difference in T cell and total Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody response between study and control group patients C_LIO_LISix (13%) study group participants did not have detectable Total Anti-SARS -Cov-2 S antibodies at any time point throughout the study monitoring period. C_LIO_LIThree (7%) of the study group participants had no response, even after additional booster doses of Covid-19 vaccine. C_LIO_LIAll (100%) of the control group had detectable Anti-SARS-Cov-2 S antibodies after 2 doses of Covid-19 vaccine. C_LIO_LINo participant died or was hospitalised due to severe Covid-19 infection during the study period. This included study group participants who had no antibody response at any time point. C_LI ConclusionsThough there was a non - significant difference in T cell and total Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody response between immunocompromised patients and healthy controls this did not result in any severe infection or Covid-19 related mortality in our study cohort. We did not identify any patient-specific factor (age, gender), specific haematological condition or treatment as determinant of response. Covid-19 vaccination was well tolerated without major side effects in both groups. What was already known about this topicprior to starting this study there were no studies to confirm immunological response following Covid-19 vaccination in immunocompromised haematology patients. During the conduct of our study there have been publications from researchers confirming blunted serological response in 62-66% of immunocompromised haematology patients compared to 74-95% in healthy controls. What this study addsOur study did not identify a significant difference in serological or T cell response between immunocompromised and healthy groups. Though 13% of immunocompromised patients had no response to Covid-19 vaccination none of them suffered from severe Covid-19 infection. We believe T cell response to Covid-19 vaccination has an important role in providing protective efficacy against Covid-19.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
7
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
8
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
18
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%