Back

Facing lethal temperatures: heat shock response in desert and temperate ants

Araujo, N. d. S.; Perez, R.; Willot, Q.; Defrance, M.; Aron, S.

2022-11-12 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.11.12.516273 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Several genera of desert ants have adapted to endure prolonged exposure to high temperatures. The study of these ants is essential to unravel how species respond and adapt to thermal stress. We investigated the thermal tolerance and the transcriptomic heat stress response of three desert ant genera (Cataglyphis, Melophorus and Ocymyrmex) and two temperate genera (Formica and Myrmica) to explore convergent and specific adaptations. We found a variable transcriptomic response among desert species exposed to similar levels of physiological heat-stress: Cataglyphis holgerseni and Melophorus bagoti differentially regulated very few transcripts, 0.12% (54/44,525) and 0.14% (53/38,726) respectively, while Cataglyphis bombycina and Ocymyrmex robustior showed greater expression alterations affecting 0.6% (253/41,912) and 1.53% (698/45,701) of their transcriptomes, respectively. These two responsive mechanisms - reactive and constitutive - were related to desert species thermal tolerance survival pattern and convergently evolved in distinct desert ant genera. By comparison, the two temperate species differentially expressed thousands of transcripts more than desert ants in response to heat stress (affecting 8% and 12,71% of F. fusca and Myr. sabuleti transcriptomes), suggesting that keeping restrained gene expression is an important adaptation in heat adapted species. Finally, we found a significant overlap of the molecular pathways activated in response to heat-stress in temperate and desert species, and our data revealed that larger gene expression responses also affected a greater number of taxonomically restricted genes. These results suggest that the molecular processes involved in heat-stress response are mostly evolutionary conserved in ants, but new genes may also play a role.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.8%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
7
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
12
Insect Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Cell Stress and Chaperones
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
16
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
23
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%