More hot air: measuring the paradox of European ecology conferences
Smith, G. C.; Begeman, L.; Coles, A.; Gilot-Fromont, E.; Lopez-Olvera, J. R.; Vale, A.; Vogler, B. R.; Kuiken, T.
Show abstract
As scientists we cause an above average carbon footprint for work-related travel. International conferences are a common way for us to meet and discuss, and we do not address the environmental costs of these meetings. Knowing the costs might help us to reduce them. Here we estimated the carbon footprint of the last five physical conferences of the European Wildlife Disease Association (EWDA). We obtained the number of participants from each country for those conferences, and along with assumed travel options, commuting, accommodation, meals and printing, estimated the carbon emissions for each conference. The estimate ranged from 155 to 1205 tons CO2 per conference, or 0.7 to 2.4 tons per person. The outlying upper value was due to one joint global conference of the EWDA and the American mother association (WDA), which takes place every eight years. The geocentre was calculated for both the country of origin of the average conference attendants and for the society membership. The former was located in Luxembourg, and the latter near Dusseldorf, Germany, just approximately 170 km to the north. This represents the shortest total distance attendees would travel. Air transport to the conference country was the major source of CO2 emissions (87-97%), and the average distance flown per person increased from 1000 km (2010) to over 2000 km (2018), since later conferences were generally further from the geocentre. The biggest reduction in carbon emissions (up to 100 tons CO2) could therefore be achieved by decreasing air travel. This could be brought about by reducing the overall travel distance to the conference, i.e. a conference location near the membership geocentre, or - by a lesser amount - by encouraging travel to the conference by train or bus, i.e. conference location near good public travel hubs, and by promoting virtual attendance. Minor but yet substantial savings could be made elsewhere (2-6 tons CO2), including providing accommodation in greener hotels located closer to the conference venue and offering vegan/local food as the default option.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrated cycles for urban biomass as a strategy to promote a CO2-neutral society - A feasibility study 93%
- Taranto’s long shadow? Cancer mortality shows alarming peaks for specific types in the most polluted city of Italy but also in surrounding towns 90%
- Education influences knowledge about environmental issues in Washington, DC, USA 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling COVID-19 contagion: Risk assessment and targeted mitigation policies 88%
- Source terms for benchmarking models of SARS-CoV-2 transmission via aerosols and droplets 88%
- Displacement ventilation: available ventilation strategy for makeshift hospitals and public buildings to contain Covid-19and other airborne diseases 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating carbon stocks and wildlife connectivity for nature-based climate solutions 89%
- Insect biomass of protected habitats under the impact of arable farming in Germany 89%
- Monitoring free-living honeybee colonies in Germany: Insights into habitat preferences, survival rates, and Citizen Science reliability 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- InterMob: A 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France 91%
- COVID-19: Public Compliance with and Public Support for Stay-at-Home Mitigation Strategies 89%
- A comparative national-level analysis of government food system resilience activities in preparation for future food system disruptions 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.