Back

Limited emergence of resistance to integrase strand inhibitors in HIV-experienced patients failing dolutegravir-based antiretroviral: Cross-sectional analysis from a Northeast Nigerian cohort

Abdullahi, A.; Kemp, S.; Gupta, R. K.

2022-11-09 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.11.08.515598 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOwing to high levels of resistance to previous first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), consolidated recommendations since 2019, from the WHO and others, have indicated that dolutegravir (DTG) is the preferred drug of choice for HIV treatment, globally. There is a paucity of resistance outcome data from non-B HIV subtypes circulating across West Africa. AimWe aimed to characterise the mutational profiles of HIV-positive patients from a small North-East Nigeria cohort, failing a DTG-based ART regimen. MethodsPlasma samples were collected and stored from 61 HIV-1 infected participants. Following failure of DTG-based ART, all samples were sequenced by Illumina whole-genome, ultra-deep sequencing. Sequencing was successful in (n=33) participants with median age of 40 years and median time on ART of 9 years. HIV-1 subtyping was performed using SNAPPy. Haplotype reconstruction and transmission were inferred using standard phylogenetic methods. ResultMost patients had mutational profiles that were reflective of prior exposure to first- and second-line ART including exposure to thymidine analogues, efavirenz and nevirapine. One patient had evidence of major INSTI DRMs (T66A, G118R, E138K and R263K), reducing efficacy of DTG. The participant was aged 18, infected with a subtype G virus and likely vertically infected. ConclusionThis study found low level resistance to DTG in the cohort, with one patient having high-level resistance to DTG and other INSTIs. Critical population level and long-term data on DTG outcomes are required to guide implementation and policy action across the region.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.