Back

Tuning the potency and therapeutic window of ImmTAC molecules by affinity modulation

Robertson, I. B.; Mulvaney, R. M.; Dieckmann, N.; Vantellini, A.; Canestraro, M.; Amicarella, F.; O'Dwyer, R.; Cole, D. K.; Harper, S.; Dushek, O.; Kirk, P.

2022-11-04 immunology
10.1101/2022.11.03.511676 bioRxiv
Show abstract

T cell engaging bispecifics have great clinical potential for the treatment of cancer and infectious diseases. The binding affinity and kinetics of a bispecific molecule for both target and T cell CD3 have substantial effects on potency and specificity, but the rules governing these relationships are not fully understood. Using ImmTAC (Immune mobilizing monoclonal TCRs Against Cancer) molecules as a model, we explored the impact of altering affinity for target and CD3 on the potency and specificity of the re-directed T cell response. This class of bispecifics, exemplified by tebentafusp which has recently shown survival benefit in a randomized phase 3 clinical trial1, bind specific target peptides presented by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) on the cell surface via an affinity-enhanced T cell receptor and can redirect T cell activation with an anti-CD3 effector moiety. The data reveal that combining a strong affinity TCR with an intermediate affinity anti-CD3 results in optimal T cell activation, while strong affinity of both targeting and effector domains significantly reduces efficacy. Moreover, by optimising the affinity of both parts of the molecule, it is possible to improve the therapeutic window. These results could be effectively modelled based on kinetic proof-reading with limited signalling. This model explained the experimental observation that strong binding at both ends of the molecules leads to reduced activity, through very stable target-bispecific-effector complexes leading to CD3 entering a non-signalling dark-state. These findings have important implications for the design of anti-CD3 based bispecifics with optimal biophysical parameters for both activity and specificity. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=164 SRC="FIGDIR/small/511676v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19ac262org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14fb9fcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13b5a52org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a6d096_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.