Hospitalization forecast to inform COVID-19 pandemic planning and resource allocation using mathematical models
Wikman-Jorgensen, P. E.; Ruiz, A.; Giner-Galvan, V.; Llenas-Garcia, J.; Segui-Ripoll, J. M.; Salinas Serrano, J. M.; Borrajo, E.; Ibarra Sanchez, J. M.; Garcia-Sabater, J. P.; Marin-Garcia, J. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has put tremendous pressure on hospital resources around the world. Forecasting demand for healthcare services is important generally, but crucial in epidemic contexts, both to facilitate resource planning and to inform situational awareness. There is abundant research on methods for predicting the spread of COVID-19 and even the arrival of COVID-19 patients to hospitals emergency departments. This study builds on that work to propose a hybrid tool, combining a stochastic Markov model and a discrete event simulation model to dynamically predict hospital admissions and total daily occupancy of hospital and ICU beds. MethodsThe model was developed and validated at San Juan de Alicante University Hospital from 10 July 2020 to 10 January 2022 and externally validated at Hospital Vega Baja. An admissions generator was developed using a stochastic Markov model that feeds a discrete event simulation model in R. Positive microbiological SARS-COV-2 results from the health departments catchment population were stratified by patient age to calculate the probabilities of hospital admission. Admitted patients follow distinct pathways through the hospital, which are simulated by the discrete event simulation model, allowing administrators to estimate the bed occupancy for the next week. The median absolute difference (MAD) between predicted and actual demand was used as a model performance measure. ResultsWith respect to the San Juan hospital data, the admissions generator yielded a MAD of 6 admissions/week (interquartile range [IQR] 2-11). The MAD between the tools predictions and actual bed occupancy was 20 beds/day (IQR 5-43), or 5% of the hospital beds. The MAD between the intensive care unit (ICU)s predicted and actual occupancy was 4 beds/day (IQR 2-7), or 25% of the beds. When the model was further evaluated with data from Hospital Vega Baja, the admissions generator showed a MAD of 2.42 admissions/week (IQR 1.02-7.41). The MAD between the tools predictions and the actual bed occupancy was 18 beds/day (IQR 19.57-38.89), or 5.1% of the hospital beds. For ICU beds, the MAD was 3 beds/day (IQR 1-5), or 21.4% of the ICU beds. ConclusionPredictions of hospital admissions, ward beds, and ICU occupancy for COVID-19 patients were very useful to hospital managers, allowing early planning of hospital resource allocation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospital length of stay throughout bed pathways and factors affecting this time: a non-concurrent cohort study of Colombia COVID-19 patients and an unCoVer network project 95%
- Probabilistic analysis of COVID-19 patients' individual length of stay in Swiss intensive care units 94%
- Regional performance variation in external validation of four prediction models for severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission: An observational multi-centre cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive accuracy of computer-aided versions of the on-admission National Early Warning Score in estimating the risk of COVID-19 for unplanned admission to hospital: a retrospective development and validation study 94%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the risk of incident SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in quarantine hospitals: the Egyptian example 94%
- Limitations of estimating antibiotic resistance using German hospital consumption data - A comprehensive computational analysis 94%
- Development and performance of a population-based risk stratification model for COVID-19 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.