Back

Potential risk polarization for acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic: Single-center experiences in Osaka, Japan

Furui, M.; Kawajiri, K.; Yoshida, T.; Kakii, B.; Oshiro, N.; Asanuma, M.; Nishioka, H.; Wada, H.

2022-10-30 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2022.10.28.22281657 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study compared the time course and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction, including mechanical complications and hospital mortality, before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at a regional core hospital in South Osaka, Japan. Moreover, it identified predictors for hospital mortality and mechanical complications. In total, 503 patients who underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2011 and December 2021 at our institution were examined retrospectively. The time course of acute myocardial infarction, mechanical complications, and mortality rate before and after the COVID-19 emergency declaration were compared. Overall, 426 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 77 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were identified. For patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the onset-to-door time was longer (181 vs. 156 min, P = 0.001) and mechanical complications were worse (7.8% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.025) after the emergency declaration of COVID-19 than before the pandemic. Age, low ejection fraction, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and mechanical complications were identified as independent risk factors for hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, using multivariable analysis. Post-declaration, age, walk-ins, referrals, and intra-aortic balloon pump use were independent predictors of mechanical complications among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Onset-to-door time and mechanical complication rate increased after the COVID-19 declaration among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Arrival by walk-in and a referral that caused treatment delay were identified as independent risk factors for mechanical complication, in addition to age, use of intra-aortic balloon pump, and post-declaration of COVID-19. Therefore, the risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic might have a polarization tendency resulting from the relief or worsening of cardiac symptoms.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
2
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.4%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
8
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
10
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
13
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
European Journal of Pharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
25
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%