Maternity and family leave experiences among female ophthalmologists
Daly, C. M.; Kraus, C. L.; Campbell, A. A.; Kaleem, M. A.; Shukla, A. G.; Mcglumphy, E.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate family and maternity leave policies and examine the social and professional impacts on female ophthalmologists ParticipantsParticipants were recruited through the Women in Ophthalmology online list-serv to complete a survey evaluating maternity leave policies and their impacts. Survey questions were repeated for each birth event after medical school for up to five birth events. ResultsThe survey was accessed 198 times, and 169 responses were unique. Most participants were practicing ophthalmologists (92.3%), with a minority in residency (5.3%), in fellowship (1.2%), on disability/leave (0.6%), or retired (0.6%). Most participants (78.3%) were within their first ten years of practice. Experiences were recorded for each leave event, with 169 responses for the first leave, 120 for the second, 28 for the third, and 2 for the fourth. Nearly half of participants reported the information they received about maternity leave to be somewhat or extremely inadequate (first: 49.7%; second: 42.1%; third: 40.9%). Many reported a greater sense of burnout after returning to work (first: 60.9%, second: 58.3%, third: 45.5%). A minority of participants received full pay during the first through third maternity leave events, 39%, 27%, and 33%, respectively. About a third of participants reported being somewhat or very dissatisfied with their maternity leave experience (first: 42.3%, second: 35.0%; third: 27.3%). ConclusionsFemale ophthalmologists have varying experiences with maternity leave, but many encounter similar challenges. This study demonstrates that many women receive inadequate information about family leave, desire more weeks of leave, experience a wide variation in pay practices, and lack support for breastfeeding. Understanding the shared experiences of women in ophthalmology identifies areas where improvements are needed in maternity leave practices within the field to create a more supportive environment for physician mothers.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 94%
- Predictors of Burnout Among Academic Family Medicine Faculty: Looking Back to Plan forward 93%
- Exploring midwives understanding of respectful and non-abusive maternal care in Kumasi, Ghana: Qualitative Inquiry 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 94%
- Out-of-hospital births and the experiences of emergency ambulance clinicians and birthing parents: A scoping review of the literature 93%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 95%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 95%
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current Practice and Challenges in Screening for Visual Perception Deficits after Stroke: a Qualitative Study 91%
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 90%
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.