Covid-19 pandemic has polarized the society toward negative and positive traits depending on a person's resilience and certain predispositions
Attary, T.; Noorbala, L.; Ghazizadeh, A.
Show abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has caused a major disruption affecting almost all aspects of health, social and economic dimensions of our lives on an almost unprecedented global scale. While Covid-19 itself is, first and foremost, a pernicious physical illness, its highly contagious nature has caused significant psychological stress with occasional dire mental health consequences which are still not fully understood. To address this issue, we have conducted a longitudinal study by administering standard self-reporting questionnaires covering five major personalities and six mental traits of subjects before and a few months after the outbreak. Results revealed the distribution of population scores to become more extreme in either positive or negative trait directions despite the stability of average trait scores across the population. Higher resilience was found to be positively correlated with improved trait scores post-pandemic. Further investigations showed that certain predispositions could have an effect on trait score change post-Covid depending on the subjects pre-Covid scores. In particular, in the subjects with moderate scores, there was a significant negative correlation between the positive trait scores and the post minus pre-positive trait scores. By examining various traits and personalities, these findings depict a more thorough picture of the pandemics impact on societys psychological well-being and reveal certain predispositions and vulnerabilities that shape the mental health landscape in the post-Covid period with implications for mental health policies in dealing with Covid-19.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronic post-COVID neuropsychiatric symptoms persisting beyond one year from infection: a case-control study and network analysis 93%
- Emotional Adaptation During A Crisis: Decline in Anxiety and Depression After the Initial Weeks of COVID-19 in the United States 92%
- Multiple-time measurements of multidimensional psychiatric states from immediately before the COVID-19 pandemic to one year later: A longitudinal online survey of the Japanese population 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Blood transcriptome analysis suggests an indirect molecular association of early life adversities and adult social anxiety disorder by immune-related signal transduction 92%
- Intron retention as an excellent marker for diagnosing depression and for discovering new potential pathways for drug intervention 92%
- Cross-continental environmental and genome-wide association study on children and adolescent anxiety and depression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The influence of repeated mild lockdown on mental and physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a large-scale longitudinal study in Japan 93%
- Multidimensional behavioral profiles associated with resilience and susceptibility after inescapable stress 92%
- Patients Recovering from COVID-19 who Presented Anosmia During their Acute Episode have Behavioral, Functional, and Structural Brain Alterations 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19-lockdown and vulnerability factors on cognitive functioning and mental health in Italian population 92%
- Why the COVID-19 pandemic is a traumatic stressor 92%
- Characteristics of University Students Supported by Counseling Services: Analysis of psychological tests and pulse rate variability 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time trends of mental health indicators in Germany’s adult population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- How different pre-existing mental disorders and their co-occurrence affects clinical outcomes of COVID-19? A study based on real-world data in the Southern United States 91%
- Stay-at-home and face mask policies intentions inconsistent with incidence and fatality during US COVID-19 pandemic 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.