Back

Physiological Changes Associated with Copper Sulfate-Induced Emesis in Felines

Murphey, C. P.; Shulgach, J. A.; Amin, P. R.; Douglas, N. K.; Bielanin, J. P.; Sampson, J. P.; Horn, C. C.; Yates, B. J.

2022-10-21 physiology
10.1101/2022.10.20.512908 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nausea is a common disease symptom, yet there is no consensus regarding its physiological markers. In contrast, the process of vomiting is well documented as sequential muscular contractions of the diaphragm and abdominal muscles and esophageal shortening. Nausea, like other self-reported perceptions, is difficult to distinguish in preclinical models, but based on human experience emesis is usually preceded by nausea. Here we focused on measuring gastrointestinal and cardiorespiratory changes prior to emesis to provide additional insights into markers for nausea. Felines were instrumented to chronically record heart rate, respiration, and electromyographic (EMG) activity from the stomach and duodenum before and after intragastric delivery of saline or copper sulfate (CuSO4, from 83 to 322 mg). CuSO4 is a prototypical emetic test agent that triggers vomiting primarily by action on GI vagal afferent fibers when administered intragastrically. CuSO4 infusion elicited a significant increase in heart rate, decrease in respiratory rate, and a disruption of gastric and intestinal EMG activity several minutes prior to emesis. The change in EMG activity was most consistent in the duodenum. Administration of saline did not induce these effects. Increasing the dose of CuSO4 did not alter the physiologic changes induced by the treatment. It is postulated that the intestinal EMG activity was related to a retrograde movement of chyme from the intestine to the stomach. These findings suggest that monitoring of intestinal EMG activity, perhaps in combination with heart rate, may provide the best indicator of the onset of nausea following treatments and in disease conditions, including GI disease, associated with emesis.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
4
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
6
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
13
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
15
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
17
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
19
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%