Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Antibiotic Choice On ReNal outcomes (ACORN) randomized clinical trial
Qian, E. T.; Casey, J. D.; Wright, A.; Wang, L.; Siemann, J. K.; Dear, M. L.; Stollings, J. L.; Lloyd, B. D.; Seitz, K. P.; Nelson, G.; Wright, P. W.; Siew, E. D.; Dennis, B. M.; Wrenn, J. O.; Andereck, J. W.; Self, W. H.; Semler, M. W.; Rice, T. W.; Vanderbilt Learning Healthcare System Platform Investigators,
Show abstract
IntroductionAntibiotics are time-critical in the management of sepsis. When infectious organisms are unknown, patients are treated with empiric antibiotics to include coverage for gram-negative organisms, such as anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins and penicillins. However, in observational studies some anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins (e.g. cefepime) is associated with neurologic dysfunction while the most common anti-pseudomonal penicillin (piperacillin-tazobactam) is associated with acute kidney injury. No randomized control trials have compared these regimens. This manuscript describes the protocol and analysis plan for a trial designed to compare the effects of anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins and anti-pseudomonal penicillins among acutely ill patients receiving empiric antibiotics. Methods and AnalysisThe Antibiotic Choice On ReNal outcomes (ACORN) trial is a prospective, single-center, non-blinded randomized trial being conducted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The trial will enroll 2,500 acutely ill adults receiving gram-negative coverage for treatment of infection. Eligible patients are randomized 1:1 to receive cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam upon first order entry of a broad-spectrum antibiotic covering gram-negative organisms. The primary outcome is the highest stage of acute kidney injury and death occurring between enrollment and 14 days after enrollment. This will be compared between patients randomized to cefepime and randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam using an unadjusted proportional odds regression model. The secondary outcomes are Major Adverse Kidney Events through day 14 and number of days alive and free of delirium and coma in 14 days after enrollment. Enrollment began on November 10, 2021 and is expected to be completed in December 2022. Ethics and DisseminationThe trial was approved by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent. Results will be submitted in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. Trial RegistrationThis trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05094154) on October 26, 2021, prior to enrollment of the first patient on November 10, 2021. Strengths and LimitationsO_LIThis ongoing pragmatic trial will compare the effects of cefepime vs piperacillin-tazobactam on acute kidney injury and death among acutely ill adults receiving gram-negative antibiotic therapy in the Emergency Department or Intensive Care Unit. C_LIO_LIStrengths: Broad eligibility criteria, inclusion of a range of indications for antibiotic therapy, and use of the electronic health record to screen for eligible patients and facilitate delivery of the assigned intervention will increase the external validity of the findings C_LIO_LILimitations: After concealed randomization, patients, clinicians, and investigators are unblinded to study group assignment. Because urine output is not systematically available across all care, the outcome of AKI is based on creatinine measurements. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Criteria to Achieve Safe Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch in Hospitalised Adult Populations: A Systematic Rapid Review 93%
- Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials 93%
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: a study protocol 94%
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 96%
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 95%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients (Helmet-COVID) Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prone positioning of patients with moderate hypoxia due to COVID-19: A multicenter pragmatic randomized trial [COVID-PRONE] 93%
- Prophylaxis for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis 93%
- No evidence of clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection with oxygen requirement: results of a study using routinely collected data to emulate a target trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 92%
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.