Back

Load and fatigue monitoring in instrumental musicians using an online app: A Pilot Study

McCrary, J. M.; Ascenso, S.; Savvidou, P.; Schraft, S.; McAllister, L.; Redding, E.; Bastepe-Gray, S.; Altenmuller, E.

2022-09-30 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2022.09.28.22280457 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background/AimsHigh occupational injury rates are reported in musicians, with a career prevalence of up to 89%. Fatigue and playing (over)load are identified as key risk factors for musicians injuries. Self-report fatigue management strategies in sport have demonstrated preventive effects. A self-report fatigue management tool for musicians was developed based on a Delphi survey of international experts and hosted in an online app. The aims of this study are to evaluate the content validity and uptake of this new tool, and explore associations between collected performance quality, physical/psychological stress, pain, injury and fatigue data. MethodsUniversity and professional musicians were asked to provide entries into the online app twice per week for one to six months. Entries into the app were designed to take 2-3 minutes to complete and consisted of the following: 6 questions regarding playing load over the previous 72 hours; 5 questions regarding current levels in key physical/psychological stress domains (sleep, recovery, overplaying, pain, fitness); one question self-rating of performance quality over the previous day; one question regarding current musculoskeletal symptoms; a reaction time task to evaluate psychomotor fatigue. ResultsN=96 participants provided an average of 2 app entries (range 0 - 43). Increased playing time, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and feelings of having to play too much were consistently associated with increased self-rated performance quality (p[&le;] .004; 6.7<|t|<2148.5). Increased ratings of feeling fit and recovering well were consistently associated with reduced pain severity (p<.001; 3.8<|t|<20.4). Pain severity was increased (6.5/10 vs. 2.5/10; p<.001) in participants reporting playing-related musculoskeletal disorders (PRMDs; symptoms affecting playing). ConclusionThe prospective value of regular individual self-report playing load, stress, and performance data collection in musicians is clear. However, limited uptake of the online fatigue management app piloted in this study indicates that new approaches to the collection of these data are needed to realize their potential impact.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.5%
5
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
6
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
14
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
17
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
18
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
21
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
23
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
24
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%